Validity of Inquiry-Based Learning Tools on Students' Scientific Argumentation Ability
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to describe the validity of inquiry-based learning tools on students' scientific argumentation abilities. The validity of the developed device is viewed from the aspects of content, language, and presentation. This type of research is pre-experimental without a control group. Method: The method used is the 4D model (define, design, and development), which is modified and implemented in the Postgraduate Program in Science Education, State University of Surabaya. The data collection technique was carried out using the learning device validation method. The assessment instrument uses a device validation sheet. The tools developed include LIP, ST, SAS, and students' scientific argumentation ability tests. Three biology lecturers assessed the validity of this inquiry-based learning tool. Data analysis was conducted quantitatively, and the Aiken validity index and reliability were calculated. Results: The validation results obtained the validity index Aikens LIP 0.97, ST 0.93, SW 0.99, and scientific argumentation test 1.00 with high validity and reliability categories. Novelty: the researcher considers that not many previous studies have conducted research on the material of the Human Respiratory System, especially in class XI Science based on guided inquiry which includes five indicators of scientific argument, namely claims, ground used, warrants given, counterarguments generated and rebuttal offered. However, this research focuses on the validation analysis of inquiry-based learning tools on high school students' scientific argumentation abilities.
Abstract View: 339 
PDF Download: 320
Similarity Check Download: 44
Metrics
References
Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
Arifin, Z. (2017). Kriteria instrumen dalam suatu penelitian. Jurnal THEOREMS, 2(1), 28-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.31949/th.v2i1.571
Berlian, L., Taufik, A. N., & Iman, A. (2021). Pengembangan instrumen tes argumentasi tulisan yang berorientasi e-learning untuk melatih keterampilan argumentasi mahasiswa. Bio Educatio, 6(2), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.31949/be.v6i2.3317
Borich, G. D. (1996). Effective teaching methods third edition. Prentice Hall.
Dawson, V., & Carson, K. (2020). Introducing argumentation about climate change socioscientific issues in a disadvantaged school. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 863–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9715-x
Devy, H. C., Puspitawati, R. P., & Yakub, P. (2020). Validitas dan efektivitas LKPD pendekatan toulmin's argument pattern untuk melatih keterampilan argumentasi. BioEdu, 9(1), 80-87.
Dianty, A. P., Supeno, S., & Astutik, S. (2020). Kemampuan decision making siswa SMA dalam pembelajaran fisika berbasis inkuiri terbimbing. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.19184/jpf.v9i1.17935
Erdani, Y., Hakim, L., & Lin, L. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap kemampuan literasi sains siswa di SMP negeri 35 palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 6(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v6i1.1549
Fadli, R., Sartono, N., & Suryanda, A. (2017). Pengembangan kamus berbasis sistem operasi telepon pintar pada materi biologi SMA kelas XI. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 8(2), 10-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v8i2.21171
Fahrurrozi, M., & Mohzana, H. (2018). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran: Tinjauan teoretis dan praktek. Universitas Hamzanwadi Press.
Fitri, F. (2017). Analisis validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen kerja akuntan menggunakan pendekatan rach model. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Peradaban, 3(1), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.24252/jiap.v3i1.4549
Gabriel, V. de O., Panisson, A. R., Bordini, R. H., Adamatti, D. F., & Billa, C. Z. (2020). Reasoning in BDI agents using toulmin's argumentation model. Theoretical Computer Science, 805, 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2019.10.026
Grooms, J. (2020). A comparison of argument quality and students' conceptions of data and evidence for undergraduates experiencing two types of laboratory instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(8), 2057–2064. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00026
Haspen, C., Syafriani, S., & Ramli, R. (2021). Validitas e-modul fisika SMA berbasis inkuiri terbimbing terintegrasi etnosains untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif peserta didik. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 5(1), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol5-iss1/548
Hendratmoko, A. F., Wasis, W., & Susantini, E. (2016). Development of physics learning materials based on guided inquiry model integrated with virtual laboratory to facilitate student's scientific argumentation ability. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 4(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v4i1.29
Hidayah, T. L., Supeno, S., & Nuha, U. (2022). Pengaruh model inkuiri terbimbing menggunakan laboratorium virtual terhadap keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah siswa SMP. Edusaintek: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi, 9(1), 239-250. https://doi.org/10.47668/edusaintek.v9i1.425
Hulu, G., & Dwiningsih, K. (2021). Validitas LKPD berbasis blended learning berbantuan multimedia interaktif untuk melatihkan visual spasial materi ikatan kovalen. Journal of Chemical Education, 10(1), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v10n1.p56-65
Ibrahim, M. (2002). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran. Depdiknas.
Khaerudin, K. (2015). Kualitas instrumen tes hasil belajar. Jurnal Madaniyah, 2(9), 212-236.
Masithah, I., Jufri, A. W., & Ramdani, A. (2022). Bahan ajar IPA berbasis inkuiri untuk meningkatkan literasi sains. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 4(2), 138-144. http://doi.org/10.29303/jcar.v4i1.1758
Matsun, M., Sari, I. N., & Boisandi, B. (2020). Pengembangan buku ajar fisika berbasis karakter dengan pendekatan kearifan lokal kalimantan barat. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(2), 162-172. http://doi.org/10.36706/jipf.v7i2.12473
Mulya, F. R., Rokhmat, J., & Ramdani, A. (2022). Validitas perangkat pembelajaran fisika model discovery untuk meningkatkan penguasaan konsep dan keterampilan generik sains. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 4(2), 128-132. http://doi.org/10.29303/jcar.v4i1.1728
Nurdyansyah, N., & Fahyuni, E. F. (2016). Inovasi model pembelajaran sesuai kurikulum 2013. Nizamia Learning Center.
Nurmayani, L., & Doyan, A. (2018). Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap hasil belajar fisika peserta didik. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 4(2), 23-29. http://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v4i2.113
Pangestika, I. W., Ramli, M., & Nurmiyati, N. (2017). The changing of oral argumentation process of grade XI students through socratic dialogue. International Journal of Science and Applied Science, 2(1), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16710
Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational design research, part A: An introduction. SLO.
Putri, W. E., Sunarno, W., & Marzuki, A. (2021). Analysis of the students’ argumentative skills of senior high school in COVID-19 pandemic using problem-based learning in static fluid. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(3), 335-343. http://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i3.735
Safirah, R., Rachmadiarti, F., & Ibrahim, M. (2022). Validitas perangkat pembelajaran daring ipa berbasis model inkuiri terbimbing untuk melatihkan literasi sains siswa SMP. Jurnal Education And Development, 10(1), 341-346.
Safaruddin, S., Degeng, I., Setyosari, P., & Murtadho, N. (2020). The Effect of PjBL with WBL Media and Cognitive Style on Students Understanding and Science-Integrated Concept Application. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 384-395. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24628
Septikasari, R., & Frasandy, R. N. (2018). 21st century 4C skills in basic education learning. Tarbiyah Al-Awlad, 8(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.15548/alawlad.v8i2.1597
Sandhy, A. K., Tandililing, E., & Oktavianty, E. (2018). Pengaruh model inkuiri untuk meningkatkan keterampilan argumentasi peserta didik terhadap materi getaran dan gelombang. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK), 7(10), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v7i10.29070
Tampubolon, R. A., Kurniawati, D., Aini, S., & Effendi, E. (2021). Pengembangan E-LKPD berbasis inkuiri terbimbing pada materi larutan penyangga untuk siswa kelas XI SMA/MA. Entalpi Pendidikan Kimia, 2(3), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.24036/epk.v2i3.184
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument, updated edition. Cambridge UniversityPress
Wikara, B., Sutarno, S., Suranto, S., & Sajidan, S. (2022). Implementation of 5E plus learning model on energy subject matter to improve students' argumentation skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(2), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.30567
Wildan, W. (2017). Model pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran bagi guru. Society, 8(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.20414/society.v8i1.1496
Yulinda, R., Sari, M. M., Hayati, F., & Rahman, A. (2022). Validitas dan praktikalitas buku ajar mikrobiologi berbasis proyek bioentrepreneurship. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 12(2), 162-171. http://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v12i2.231
Zakaria, L. M. A., Purwoko, A. A., & Hadisaputra, S. (2020). Pengembangan bahan ajar kimia berbasis masalah dengan pendekatan brain based learning: Validitas dan reliabilitas. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(5), 554-557. http://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v15i5.2258
Zaroh, I., Muntholib, M., & Joharmawan, R. (2022). Implementasi instrumen asesmen argumentasi ilmiah materi laju reaksi. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 6(1), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v6i1.12191
Copyright (c) 2023 IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 339 times
PDF downloaded = 320 times
Similarity Check downloaded = 44 times
