Development of Chemistry Lecture Sets for Reducing Logical Fallacy in Arguing
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to develop a lecture set designed to reduce the occurrence of logical fallacies by training students' argumentation skills. Method: The lecture sets were developed to refer to the stages of the ADDIE development model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). Validity was validated by three validators on student activity sheets and argumentative ability assessment sheets. The validity of the test results was obtained based on the mode of calculation and the percentage of agreement between validators. Results: The lecture sets are structured by containing six types of logical fallacies, namely relative privation, blind authority fallacy, hasty generalization, questionable cause fallacy, reification fallacy, and non sequitur, and includes general chemistry lecture material, namely stoichiometry, atomic structure, periodicity of elements, chemical bonds, the concentration of the solution, the equilibrium of ions in the solution, and the colligative properties of the solution. The chemistry lecture sets for reducing logical fallacies in arguing has been declared valid by the validator. Novelty: The results of this study can be used as a reference by teachers, lecturers, or other researchers who wish to study more about logical fallacies.
Abstract View: 214 
PDF Download: 177
Similarity Check Download: 35
Metrics
References
Akhdinirwanto, R. W., Agustini, R., & Jatmiko, B. (2020). Problem-based learning with argumentation as a hypothetical model to increase the critical thinking skills for junior high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 340–350. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i3.19282
Almerich, G., Suárez-Rodríguez, J., Díaz-García, I., & Cebrián-Cifuentes, S. (2020). 21st-century competences: The relation of ICT competences with higher-order thinking capacities and teamwork competences in university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 468–479. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12413
Arzak, K. A., & Prahani, B. K. (2023). The physics problem solving skills profile of high school students in elasticity material and the implementation of augmented reality book-assisted PBL model. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v7i1.6704
Bennett, B. (2020). Logical fallacious: The ultimate collection of over 300 logical fallacies. Archieboy Holdings.
Bonial, C., Hudson, T. A., Blodgett, A., Lukin, S. M., Micher, J., Summers-Stay, D., Sutor, P., & Voss, C. R. (2022). You can’t quarantine the truth: Lessons learned in logical fallacy annotation of an infodemic. Devcom Army Research Laboratory.
Borich, G. D. (1994). Observation Skills for Effective Teaching. Michigan: Merrill.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: ADDIE approach. Springer Science & Business Media.
Bronkhorst, H., Roorda, G., Suhre, C., & Goedhart, M. (2020). Logical reasoning in formal and everyday reasoning tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(8), 1673–1694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10039-8
Chang, R., & Overby, J. (2019). Chemistry (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Chin, M., & Osborne, J. (2010). Supporting argumentation through student’s questions in a science classroom. Journal of The Learning Science, 19(2), 230 – 284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530036
Chinn, C. A., Barzilai, S., & Duncan, R. G. (2020). Disagreeing about how to know: The instructional value of explorations into knowing. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1786387
Christoforides, M., Spanoudis, G., & Demetriou, A. (2016). Coping with logical fallacies: A development training program for learning to reason. Society for Research in Child Development, 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12557
Gallant, E. E., Reeve, K. F., Reeve, S. A., Vladescu, J. C., & Kisamore, A. N. (2020). Comparing two equivalence-based instruction protocols and self-study for teaching logical fallacies to college students. Behavioral Interventions, 36, 434-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1772
Hasibuan, S. H., Yusriati, Y., & Manurung, I. D. (2020). Examining argument elements and logical fallacies of english education students in oral discussion. Tell: Teaching of English Language and Literature, 8(2), 48-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.30651/tell.v8i2.5771
Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Irawati, M., & Suwono, H. (2019). The contribution of argumentation and critical thinking skills on students’ concept understanding in different learning models. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.1.6
Iordanou, K., & Rapanta, C. (2021). “Argue With Me”: A Method for Developing Argument Skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631203
Kabataş Memiş, E., & Çakan Akkaş, B. N. (2020). Developing critical thinking skills in the thinking-discussion-writing cycle: the argumentation-based inquiry approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(3), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09635-z
Lytzerinou, E., & Iordanou, K. (2020). Teachers’ ability to construct arguments, but not their perceived self-efficacy of teaching, predicts their ability to evaluate arguments. International Journal of Science Education, 42(4), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1722864
Majidi, A. el, Janssen, D., & de Graaff, R. (2021). The effects of in-class debates on argumentation skills in second language education. System, 101, 102576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102576
Mtawa, N., Fongwa, S., & Wilson-Strydom, M. (2021). Enhancing graduate employability attributes and capabilities formation: A service-learning approach. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(5), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1672150
Mustofa, H., & Mahfudh, A. (2019). Klasifikasi berita hoax dengan menggunakan metode naive bayes. Walisongo Journal of Information Technology, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.21580/wjit.2019.1.1.3915
Neswary, S. B. A., & Prahani, B. K. (2022). Profile of students’ physics critical thinking skills and application of problem based learning models assisted by digital books in physics learning in high school. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 781–789. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i2.1444
Neylan, J. H., Patel, S. S., & Erickson, T. B. (2021). Strategies to counter disinformation for healthcare practitioners and policymakers. World Medical & Health Policy, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.487
Nouri, J., Zhang, L., Mannila, L., & Norén, E. (2020). Development of computational thinking, digital competence and 21st century skills when learning programming in K-9. Education Inquiry, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1627844
Ozden, M. (2020). Elementary school students’ informal reasoning and its’ quality regarding socio-scientific issues. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(86), 61–84.
Rubinelli, S., Ort, A., Zanini, C., Fiordelli, M., & Diviani, N. (2021). Strengthening critical health literacy for health information appraisal: An approach from argumentation theory. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136764
Saphira, H. V., & Prahani, B. K. (2022). Profile of senior high school students’ critical thinking skills and the need of implementation PBL model assisted by augmented reality book. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(3), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i3.25031
Saribas, D., & Çetinkaya, E. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ analysis of claims about COVID-19 in an online course. Science & Education, 30(2), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00181-z
Sholihah, T. M., & Lastariwati, B. (2020). Problem based learning to increase competence of critical thinking and problem solving. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(1), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v14i1.13772
Spöttl, G., & Windelband, L. (2021). The 4th industrial revolution – its impact on vocational skills. Journal of Education and Work, 34(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2020.1858230
Suyono, S., Nasrudin, H., & Yonata, B. (2019). Concistency and relevance of structured lecture materials in physical chemistry 3 subject. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 390, 188-194. https://doi.org/10.2991/icracos-19.2020.40
Suyono, S., Nasrudin, H., & Yonata, B. (2020). Kemampuan argumentasi mahasiswa kimia dalam menilai fenomena viral dari jejaring sosial. Laporan Penelitian. LPPM Unesa
Suyono, S., Nasrudin, H., & Yonata, B. (2021). Analisis kesalahan penalaran mahasiswa kimia FMIPA unesa dalam berargumentasi. Laporan Penelitian LPPM Unesa.
Tight, M. (2021). Twenty-first century skills: Meaning, usage and value. European Journal of Higher Education, 11(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1835517
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 10(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
Copyright (c) 2024 IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 214 times
PDF downloaded = 177 times
Similarity Check downloaded = 35 times
