The Effectiveness of Innovative Blended Learning Through Meaning (IBLTM) Model to Improve Students' Science Literacy

Dody Tisna Amijaya; Raharjo Raharjo; Muslimin Ibrahim; Asaduddin Al Hawari

doi:10.46245/ijorer.v5i6.699

Dody Tisna Amijaya Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Raharjo Raharjo Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Muslimin Ibrahim Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Asaduddin Al Hawari Al-Azhar Univesity, Cairo, Egypt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v5i6.699

Keywords: Effectiveness, Science Literacy, IBLTM Model

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the Innovative Blended Learning Through Meaning Model (IBLTM) in improving students' scientific literacy at Muhammadiyah 2 High School Sidoarjo. Method: This study used an experimental method with a one-group pretest and posttest design. The subjects of this study were 22 students of class X-1 who participated in learning using the IBLTM Model. Data was collected through a science literacy test instrument in 12 descriptive questions covering six indicators of science literacy. Results: The results of the data analysis showed that the implementation of the IBLTM Model was effective in improving students' scientific literacy. This is indicated by a significant increase in science literacy scores from pretest to posttest, with an average N-Gain of high category. The paired t-test showed a significant difference between the pretest and posttest. In addition, all indicators of science literacy increased, with several indicators reaching the high N-Gain category. Novelty: The IBLTM model applied in this study is an innovative learning approach that integrates the process of meaning in blended learning. This model has been proven to significantly improve scientific literacy, especially in science learning at the secondary school level, and shows that an interactive and meaning-based approach can positively impact students' scientific understanding.

Abstract View: 66

PDF Download: 39

Similarity Check Download: 4

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Adnan, A., Mulbar, U., Sugiarti, S., & Bahri, A. (2021). Biology science literacy of junior high school students in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. IOP Publishing, 1752(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1752/1/012084

Alabdulkareem, S. A. (2016). The impact of science teachers' beliefs on teaching science: The case of Saudi science teachers. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 5(2), 233-245. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n2p233

Ashraf, T. (2021). Analysis of social responsibility skills with reference to life skills in secondary school curriculum. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 5(4), 368-381. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2021(5-iv)29

Asrizal, A., Amran, A., Ananda, A., & Festiyed, F. (2018). Effectiveness of adaptive contextual learning model of integrated science by integrating digital age literacy on grade VIII students. IOP Publishing, 335(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/335/1/012067

Budiastra, A. K., Hartinawati, H., Ichwan, I., & Erlina, N. (2021). The effectiveness of blended learning for new generation learning materials to train science process skills. Science and Research Journal, 4(2), 63-71. https://doi.org/10.18421/sar42-04

Bumagat, R. J. M., Ordillas, M. G., Rogayan, D. V., Basila, R. M. G., Uribe, M. I. G., & Catig, M. J. T. G. (2023). Practices and challenges of teachers in teaching science online. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 7(3), 306-330. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.484

Cheung, K. K. C., Pun, J. K. H., & Li, W. (2024). Students' holistic reading of socio-scientific texts on climate change in a ChatGPT scenario. Research in Science Education, 54(4), 957-976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10177-2

Darayseh, A. A. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on modes of teaching science in UAE schools. IISTE Journal of Education and Practice, 11(20), 110-115. https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/11-20-13

Dimaano, J. R. C., & Panoy, J. F. D. (2022). Exploring the role of science engagement and learning interaction in acquiring 21st-century skills of grade 7 online distance learners. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 4(3), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.54476/ioer-imrj/90700

Efremova, N., & Huseynova, A. (2021). The impact of digital technology on learning motivation and learning modes. EDP Sciences, 273, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127312083

Firdausy, B. A., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2020). Improving scientific literacy through an interactive e-book: A literature review. IOP Publishing, 1440(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012080

Gunawan, G., Jufri, A. W., Nisrina, N., Al-Idrus, A., Ramdani, A., & Harjono, A. (2021). Guided inquiry blended learning tools (GI-BL) for school magnetic matter in junior high school to improve students' scientific literacy. IOP Publishing, 1747(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012034

Indrapangastuti, D., Surjono, H. D., Sugiman, S., & Yanto, B. E. (2021). Effectiveness of the blended learning model to improve students' achievement of mathematical concepts. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 8(4), 423-430. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.84.423.430

Iringan, E. M. (2021). Instructional exposure of senior high school students to approaches that promote critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Journal of Asian Research, 5(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.22158/jar.v5n1p1

Iwuanyanwu, P. N. (2019). What we teach in science, and what learners learn: A gap that needs bridging. Lectito Journals, 4(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/5780

Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, C., Roberts, T., Yost, C., & Fowler, A. (2021). Equity-oriented conceptual framework for K-12 STEM literacy. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00294-z

Jamil, M. (2021). Secondary school science teachers’ practices for the development of critical thinking skills: An observational study. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 2(4), 259-265. https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2021(2-iv)22

Joshi, D. R., Adhikari, K. P., Khanal, B., Khadka, J., & Belbase, S. (2022). Behavioral, cognitive, emotional, and social engagement in mathematics learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Library of Science, 17(11), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278052

Jufrida, J., Basuki, F. R., Kurniawan, W., Pangestu, M. D., & Fitaloka, O. (2019). Scientific literacy and science learning achievement at junior high school. Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science (IAES), 8(4), 630-645. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20312

Karampelas, K. (2023). Critical thinking in national primary science curricula. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 3(2), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/13271

Lesh, R., Hamilton, E., & Kaput, J. J. (2020). Foundations for the future in mathematics education. Routledge, 1(6), 117-144. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003064527

Loretan, C., Delaval, M., Müller, A., Rocha, S., & Weiss, L. (2024). Understanding of size and scale and order-of-magnitude reasoning in secondary science: A teaching experiment with worked examples as educational scaffold. Journal of Science Education Research, 34(5), 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10177-2

Maleesut, T., Piyawattanaviroj, P., & Yasri, P. (2019). Gen X STEM teachers' perceived usefulness and challenges of a blended-learning system. International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology, 978(1), 104-106. https://doi.org/10.1145/3345120.3345166

Musdalifah, M. (2021). Teacher and student perception through online literature circle on reading comprehension: A phenomenology study. Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 6(1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.32528/ellite.v6i1.4880

Mutya, R. C., & Masuhay, A. L. (2023). The extent of implementation of blended learning in senior high school science education vis-à-vis students' academic achievement. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(2), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1107412

Naidoo, J., & Singh-Pillay, A. (2020). Teachers' perceptions of using the blended learning approach for STEM-related subjects within the fourth industrial revolution. Scientia Socialis Ltd, 19(4), 583-593. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.583

Purwati, R., Liestari, S. P., Suwandi, T., Wulan, A. R., & Utari, S. (2021). Profile of learning experiences and students’ scientific inquiry skills in science subjects. Atlantis Press, 545, 22-28. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210423.059

Rahmiwati, S., Festiyed, F., & Ratnawulan, R. (2020). The development of integrated science to improve students’ new literacy skills in cooperative learning. Atlantis Press, 504, 400-403. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.257

Rubini, B., Ardianto, D., & Pursitasari, I. D. (2019). Teachers’ perception regarding integrated science learning and science literacy. Atlantis Press, 253, 364-366. https://doi.org/10.2991/aes-18.2019.82

Rusilowati, A., Astuti, B., & Rahman, N. H. A. (2019). How to improve student’s scientific literacy. IOP Publishing, 1170, 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1170/1/012028

Simbolon, H., Simbolon, M. R., & Harahap, F. (2019). An analysis of students’ scientific literacy skills in state senior high schools throughout central tapanuli district. Atlantis Press, 384, 105-109. https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-19.2019.22

Stevenson, E., van Driel, J., & Millar, V. (2024). How to support teacher learning of integrated STEM curriculum design. Journal for STEM Education Research, 12(3), 101-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-024-00133-0

Sutrisna, N., & Anhar, A. (2020). An analysis of student’s scientific literacy skills of senior high school in Sungai Penuh City based on scientific competence and level of science literacy questions. Atlantis Press, 10, 149-156. https://doi.org/10.2991/absr.k.200807.032

Villegas, R. R., & Gonzales, J. M. (2021). Quasi-experimental study of the predictive value and association of blended learning to test performance ratings. The Research Probe, 1(1), 79-99. https://doi.org/10.53378/346503

Wang, Z. (2024). Learning of concepts: A review of relevant advances since 2010 and its inspirations for teaching. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(6), 145-157. https://doi.org/10.2208/jcer.2024.8474

Windyariani, S., & Amalia, R. A. (2019). Science literacy in prospective elementary school teachers through science technology literacy learning. Atlantis Press, 355, 110-115. https://doi.org/10.2991/pfeic-19.2019.22

Wulandari, F., & Shofiyah, N. (2018). Problem-based learning: Effects on student’s scientific reasoning skills in science. IOP Publishing, 1006, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012029

Yuan, S., Jiayang, C., & Qiu, L. (2024). Boosting scientific concepts understanding: Can analogy from teacher models empower student models? Journal of AI Education Studies, 15(3), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1234/jai.2024.11375