Analysis of Pre-service Teachers' Skills in Providing Feedback to Students During Field Experience Practice in School

Hardianto Rahman; Muhammad Irfan; Faidah Yusuf; A. Muh. Ali; A. Umar Abadi

doi:10.46245/ijorer.v6i2.799

Hardianto Rahman Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia
Muhammad Irfan Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia
Faidah Yusuf Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia
A. Muh. Ali Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia
A. Umar Abadi Universitas of Madinah, Madinah, Saudi Arabia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v6i2.799

Keywords: Feedback skills, FEP implementation, Pre-service Teachers, Schools, Teacher

Abstract

Objective: This study investigates pre-service teachers' (PST) feedback skills during Field Experience Practice (FEP), identifies influencing factors, and examines their impact on student learning. Method: A mixed-methods approach was used, combining quantitative data from 42 PSTs and 57 teachers via questionnaires and qualitative insights from interviews, observations, and documentation. Descriptive statistics were employed to categorize feedback proficiency, while qualitative analysis explored contextual influences. Results: Findings reveal three levels of feedback skills—high, medium, and low—determined by internal factors (pedagogical understanding, teaching experience) and external factors (supervisor support, school environment). Effective feedback enhances student comprehension, motivation, and engagement, yet many PSTs struggle with providing structured, actionable feedback. Novelty: This study uniquely focuses on PSTs’ feedback skills during FEP, highlighting key factors influencing their effectiveness and the impact on student learning. It also provides evidence-based recommendations for strengthening teacher education curricula by integrating structured feedback training, ultimately improving classroom interactions and learning outcomes.

Abstract View: 153

PDF Download: 113

Similarity Check Download: 9

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Asad, M. M., Hussain, N., Wadho, M., Khand, Z. H., & Churi, P. P. (2021). Integration of e-learning technologies for interactive teaching and learning process: An empirical study on higher education institutes of Pakistan. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(3), 649–663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2020-0103

Bondarchuk, O., Balakhtar, V., & Balakhtar, K. (2020). Monitoring of the quality of the psychological component of teachers’ activity of higher education institutions based on Google Forms. E3S Web of Conferences, 166, 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016610024

Burgess, A., van Diggele, C., Roberts, C., & Mellis, C. (2020a). Tips for teaching procedural skills. BMC Medical Education, 20(2), 458-465. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02284-1

Burgess, A., van Diggele, C., Roberts, C., & Mellis, C. (2020b). Tips for teaching procedural skills. BMC Medical Education, 20, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02284-1

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018a). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018b). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Carless, D., & Winstone, N. (2023). Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(1), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage. https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939.2012.723954

David, N., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Dinda, F. Z. (2024). Pemanfaatan umpan balik positif dalam membantu siswa membangun kepercayaan diri dalam bahasa Inggris. Seminar Ilmiah FIP UMJ, 1-10.

Gunawan, S. (2022). Keakuratan umpan balik asesmen terhadap hasil belajar kognitif siswa pada pengerjaan formatif secara daring. Refleksi Edukatika, 13(1), 1-11.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 1-12.

Hermawan, I. (2019). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan (kualitatif, kuantitatif dan mixed method) (C. S. Rahayu, Ed.; 1st ed.). Hidayatyl Quran.

Hermawan, L. (2024). Peningkatan keterampilan guru dalam menyusun instrumen penilaian berbasis kinerja di SMP Wiraswasta Batang Kuis. Edukatif, 2(1), 1-12.

Jannah, F. (2024). Teacher communication patterns in the One Week One Book Program to increase motivation to read Class X MA An-Najah I Karduluk. Al - Afkar, 7(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v7i3.1074

Johnson, R. A., & Bhattacharyya, G. K. (2019). Statistics: Principles and methods. Wiley.

Kovarthini, M., Balakrishnan, S., Kumar, B. P., Laxman, P., Devika, S. S., & Mishra, M. K. (2024). Teacher training and its long-term effects on student success in higher education. Library Progress International, 44(3), 3210–3215.

Kurniawaty, R. (2024). Umpan balik yang efektif bagi siswa. BPMP Provinsi DKI Jakarta.

Lamada, M. (2024). Evaluasi pelaksanaan MBKM jurusan teknik informatika dan komputer fakultas teknik universitas negeri makassar. Jurnal Media TIK, 7(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.59562/mediatik.v7i1.1603

Mahadi, U. (2021). Komunikasi pendidikan (urgensi komunikasi efektif dalam proses pembelajaran). JOPPAS: Journal of Public Policy and Administration Silampari, 2(2), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.31539/joppa.v2i2.2385

Mapplebeck, A., & Dunlop, L. (2021). Oral interactions in secondary science classrooms: A grounded approach to identifying oral feedback types and practices. Research in Science Education, 51, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9843-y

Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741

Nainggolan, B. V. H. (2024). Pentingnya pemberian umpan balik untuk memperbaiki kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika. PlusMinus, 4(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v4i1.1460

Nicol, D., & MacFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Priadana, S. (2021). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Pascal Book.

Rindaningsih, I. (2023). Buku ajar profesi keguruan. Umsida Press https://doi.org/10.21070/2022/978-623-464-051-9

Shute, V. J. (2008a). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 1-12.

Shute, V. J. (2008b). Review of educational research focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 1-11.

Tracy, S. J. (2024). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. John Wiley & Sons.

van der Zanden, P. J. A. C., Denessen, E., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Meijer, P. C. (2020). Fostering critical thinking skills in secondary education to prepare students for university: Teacher perceptions and practices. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 25(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2020.1846313

Van Doorsselaere, J. (2021). Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage through formal education in Flanders: A critical analysis of the implementation of the 2003 UNESCO Convention. International Journal of Intangible Heritage, 16, 1-12.

Wahyuddin, W. (2020). Meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika melalui pembelajaran dengan pemberian tugas terstruktur disertai umpan balik. J-MPM, 8(2), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.33394/mpm.v8i2.3142

Wardhana, A. (2024). Consumer behavior in the digital era 4.0 (M. Pradana, Ed.). EUREKA MEDIA AKSARA.

Widyastuti, A. (2022). Merdeka belajar dan implementasinya: Merdeka guru siswa, merdeka dosen mahasiswa, semua bahagia. Elex Media Komputindo.

Wiśniewska, M., & Grudowski, P. (2017). The high-quality business school academic teacher of the 21st century – Polish students’ perspective. Journal of Economics and Management Research, 6, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.22364/jemr.6.2017.01

Wiśniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 25-33. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087

Zuchowski, I., Watson, S., Dickinson, T., Thomas, N., & Croaker, S. (2019). Quantitative research: Social work students’ feedback about students’ suitability for field education and the profession. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 31(2), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol31iss2id637

Analysis of Pre-service Teachers' Skills in Providing Feedback to Students During Field Experience Practice in School

Abstract

Metrics

References

Announcements

Call for Papers 2025