The Influence of the Blended Learning Model on Fifth-Grade Students’ Motivation in Physical Education at SD Aisyiyah Sukabumi

  • Bachtiar Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi,  Indonesia
  • Sopian Sauri Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi,  Indonesia
  • Muhammad Saleh Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi,  Indonesia
  • Wening Nugraheni Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi,  Indonesia
  • Ade Tuti Lestari Universitas Situs Jaya Banten,  Indonesia
Keywords: Learning Model, Blended Learning, Learning Motivation

Abstract

Objective :This study aims to examine the effect of the blended learning model on learning motivation in physical education for fifth-grade students at SD Aisyiyah, Sukabumi. Method: The research employed a quantitative pre-experimental design using a One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design. The population consisted of all fifth-grade students, and a sample of 21 students was selected using cluster random sampling within a probability sampling framework. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a paired-sample t-test. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a paired sample t-test. Results: The analysis demonstrated an increase in student learning motivation after the implementation of blended learning. The pretest produced a mean score of 27.04 (SD=9.255), while the posttest mean score increased to 38.00 (SD=3.619). The paired-sample t-test yielded a significance value of 0.000 (<0.05), that the blended learning model had a significant effect on students’ learning motivation. Novelty: This study contributes to the existing literature on blended learning by emphasizing its effectiveness in enhancing motivation in physical education, an area that often receives less attention compared to academic subjects. The findings offer empirical evidence that blended learning can be a valuable approach in elementary school to promote students’ engagement and motivation in physical activity learning.

Abstract View: 85 PDF Download: 40 SIMILARITY CHECK Download: 20
Download data is not yet available.

References

Agboola, A., & Tsai, K. C. (2012). Bring character education into classroom. European Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.1.2.163

Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2025). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59(2), 1461–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5

Bailey, R. (2006). Physical education and sport in schools: A review of benefits and outcomes. Journal of School Health, 76(8), 397–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6561.2006.00132.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00132.x

Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937

Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3

Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006

Bull, F. C., Al-Ansari, S. S., Biddle, S., Borodulin, K., Buman, M. P., Cardon, G., Carty, C., Chaput, J.-P., Chastin, S., & Chou, R. (2020). World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(24), 1451–1462. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955

Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119864660

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5

Ekantini, A. (2022). The effectiveness of project based learning model for self regulated learning: A case study of post-pandemic elementary school science learning. Al-Bidayah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 14(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.14421/albidayah.v14i1.889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/albidayah.v14i1.889

Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage publications limited. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920979282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920979282

Garrison, D. R. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269558

Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003

Hake, R. R. (1999). American educational research association’s division d, measurement and research methodology: analyzing change/gain scores. USA: Woodland Hills. https://web.physics.indiana.edu/sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf

Harrison, T., Morris, I., & Ryan, J. (2022). Teaching character in the digital age: Developing moral and civic virtues in young people. Educational Review, 74(3), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1778264.

Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63(5), 564–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5

Keller, J. M. (2009). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1250-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1250-3

Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307

Mercier, K., Centeio, E., Garn, A., Erwin, H., Marttinen, R., & Foley, J. (2021). Physical education teachers’ experiences with remote instruction during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(2), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0272

Ntoumanis, N., Ng, J. Y. Y., Prestwich, A., Quested, E., Hancox, J. E., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Lonsdale, C., & Williams, G. C. (2021). A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health. Health Psychology Review, 15(2), 214–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529

Paulhus, D. L., & Vazire, S. (2007). The self-report method. Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology, 1(2007), 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop202011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop202011

Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2020). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z

Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701

Rasmitadila, R., Aliyyah, R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). The perceptions of primary school teachers of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 90–109. . https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/388 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/388

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68

Shadish, W. R. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Wadsworth Cengage Learning. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195108996.001.0001

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th Еd.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education. https://doi. org/10.1207. https://doi.org/10.1037/10805-000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10805-000

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Varea, V., & González-Calvo, G. (2021). Touchless classes and absent bodies: teaching physical education in times of Covid-19. Sport, Education and Society, 26(8), 831–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1791814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1791814

Xiang, M., Zhang, Z., & Kuwahara, K. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on children and adolescents’ lifestyle behavior larger than expected. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 63(4), 531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2020.04.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2020.04.013

Published
2025-11-29
How to Cite
Lau, B., Sauri, S., Saleh, M., Nugraheni, W., & Tuti Lestari, A. (2025). The Influence of the Blended Learning Model on Fifth-Grade Students’ Motivation in Physical Education at SD Aisyiyah Sukabumi. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 6(6), 1846-1858. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v6i6.1146
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 85 times
PDF downloaded = 40 times SIMILARITY CHECK downloaded = 20 times