CCDSR Learning Model: Innovation in Physics Learning

  • Iqbal Limatahu University of Khairun, Ternate, Indonesia
  • Husni Mubarok National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
Keywords: CCDSR, Learning Model, Physics Learning, Science Process Skills, Science Process Skills Learning

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the validity of the CCDSR learning model. The CCDSR learning model that was developed was validated by 3 experts in a discussion forum commonly called Focus Group Discussion (FGD). The results of the validator assessment indicate that the content and construct validity of the CCDSR learning model are very valid criteria. The valid CCDSR learning model means having several characteristics, namely meeting the need (need), state (the state of the art), having a strong theoretical and empirical foundation, and there is consistency between the components of the model. The CCDSR learning model is included in the criteria of validity, both content and construct so that it can be used as a guide in preparing plans to improve science process skills (SPS) and SPS learning for students of prospective physics teachers.

Abstract View : 337, PDF Download : 143
Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, C., Parris, J., Lie, R., Guzdar, A., & Tour, E. (2015). Critical analysis of primary literature in a master’s-level class: Effects on self-efficacy and science-process skills. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14, 1-13.

Abell, S.K. 2007. Research on science teacher knowledge. In S.K. Abell & N.G.Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Alfin, J., Fuad, A. Z., Nur, M., Yuanita, L., & Prahani, B.K. (2019). Development of group science learning (GSL) model to improve the skills of collaborative problem solving, science process, and self-confidence of primary schools teacher candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1-18.

Arabacioglu, S., & Unver, A.O. (2016). Supporting inquiry-based laboratory practices with mobile learning to enhance students’ process skills in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(2), 216-230.

Arends, R.I. (2012). Learning to teach. New York: Mc. Graw-Hill.

Astutik, S., & Prahani, B.K. (2018). The practicality and effectiveness of collaborative creativity learning (CCL) model by using PhET simulation to increase students’ scientific creativity. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 409-424.

Aydin, A. (2013). Representation of science process skills in the chemistry curricula for grades 10, 11 and 12 Turkey. International Journal of Education and Practice, 1(5), 51-63.

Berg, C.A.R., Bergendahl, V.C.B., & Lundberg, B.K.S. (2003). Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 112-121.

Christensen, T.K. (2008). The role of theory in instructional design: Some views of an ID practitioner. Performance Improvement, 47(4), 25-32.

Colvill, M., & Pattie, I. (2002). The building blocks for scientific literacy. Australian Primary & Junior Science Journal, 18(3), 20-30.

Crawford, B.A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937.

Crockett, M.D. (2002). Inquiry as professional development: Creating dilemmas through teachers’ work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(5), 609-624.

Dewi, N.I., Poedjiastoeti, S., & Prahani, B.K. (2017). ELSII learning model based local wisdom to improve students’ problem-solving skills and scientific communication. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(1), 107-118.

Dikti, P. R. (2015). Peraturan menteri riset, teknologi, dan pendidikan tinggi Republik Indonesia. nomor 44 tahun 2015. tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta: Kemenristekdikti.

Ding, L., Reay, N., Lee, A., & Bao, L. (2011). Exploring the role of conceptual scaffolding in solving synthesis problems. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 7(2), 020109.

Dogan, I., & Kunt, H. (2016). Determination of prospective preschool teachers' science process skills. Journal of European Education, 6 (1), 32-42.

Erika, F., Prahani, B.K., Supardi, Z.A.I., & Tukiran (2018). Development of a graphic organizer-based argumentation learning (GOAL) model for improving the ability to argue and self-efficacy of chemistry teacher candidates. World Trans on Engineering and Technology Education, 16(2), 179-185.

Evendi, Susantini, E., Wasis, & Prahani, B.K. (2018). Improving students’ scientific asking skills through the implementation of question webs based learning model. Journal Physics: Conference Series, 1108, 012037.

Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gerald, F. L. (2011). The twin purposes of guided inquiry: Guiding student inquiry and evidence-based practice. Scan, 30(1), 26-41.

Gravemeijer, K. & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research form in a learning design perspective. In: Van den Akker, J., Gravenmeijer, K, McKenney, S. & Nieveen, N. (Eds). Educational Design Research. London: Routledge, 17-51.

Hinton, P.R., McMurray, I., & Brownlow, C. (2014). SPSS explained; Second edition. New York: Routledge.

Hunaidah, Susantini, E., Wasis, Prahani, B.K., & Mahdiannur, M.A. (2018). Improving collaborative critical thinking skills of physics education students through implementation of CinQASE learning model. Journal Physics: Conference Series, 1108, 012101.

In, K.N., & Thongperm, O. (2014). Teaching of science process skills in Thai contexts: Status, supports and obstacles. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141(1), 1324-1329.

Jatmiko, B., Prahani, B.K., Munasir, Supardi, Z.A.I., Wicaksono, I., Erlina, N., Pandiangan, P., Althaf, R., & Zainuddin. (2018). The comparison of OR-IPA teaching model and problem based learning model effectiveness to improve critical thinking skills of pre-service physics teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(2), 1-22.

Joyce, B., Weil, M. & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of teaching, eight editions. New York: Pearson Education.

Karsli, F., & Ayas, A. (2014). Developing a laboratory activity by using 5e learning model on student learning of factors affecting the reaction rate and improving scientific process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 663-668.

Karsli, F., & Sahin, C. (2009). Developing worksheet based on science process skills: Factors affecting solubility. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10 (1), 1-16.

Limatahu, I., Wasis, Suyatno, S., & Prahani, B.K. (2018). Development of CCDSR teaching model to improve science process skills of pre-service physics teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(5), 812-827.

Limatahu, I. (2016). Pengembangan model perangkat pembelajaran fisika menerapkan MPBM untuk mendukung program PPL II mahasiswa FKIP unkhair ternate. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains Tahun 2016, Surabaya: 545-553.

Limatahu, I. (2017). Makalah seminar hasil: Pengembangan model pembelajaran CCDSR untuk meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains calon guru fisika. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Limatahu, I., Suyatno, Wasis, & Prahani, B.K. (2018). The effectiveness of CCDSR learning model to improve skills of creating lesson plan and worksheet science process skills (SPS) for pre-service physics teacher. Journal Physics: Conference Series, 997, 012032.

Lin, S.Y., & Singh, C. (2015). Effect of scaffolding on helping introductory physics students solve quantitative problems involving strong alternative conceptions. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 11(2), 020105.

Luft, J. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programs on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International journal of science education, 23(5), 517-534.

Madeali, H., & Prahani, B.K. (2018). Development of multimedia learning based inquiry on vibration and wave material. Journal Physics: Conference Series, 997, 012029.

Moreno, R. (2010). Educational psychology. New Mexico. John Wiley & Sons.

Nieveen, N., McKenney, S., van d. Akker (2007). Educational design research. New York: Routledge.

Opara, J.A., & Oguzor, N.S. (2011). Inquiry instructional method and the school science currículum. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 188-198.

Orlich, R. J. (2010). Teaching strategies. A guide to effective instruction. 9th edition. ISBN-13: 978-0-547-21293-3. Boston: Wadsworth 25 Thomson Placa. Boston, MA 02210-1202 USA. Printed in the United States of America.

Pandiangan, P., Sanjaya, I.G.M., & Jatmiko, B. (2017). The validity and effectiveness of physics independent learning model to improve physics problem solving and self-directed learning skills of students in open and distance education systems. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(5), 651-665.

Prahani, B.K., Soegimin, W.W., & Yuanita, L. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran fisika model inkuiri terbimbing untuk melatihkan keterampilan penyelesaian masalah berbasis multi representasi siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains, 4 (2), 503-517.

Purwaningsih, E., Suyatno, Wasis, & Prahani, B.K. (2018). The effectiveness of comcorels model to improve skills of creating physics lesson plan (CPLP) for pre-service physics teacher. Journal Physics: Conference Series, 997, 012022.

Rosa, F.O. (2015). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran IPA SMP pada Materi Tekanan Berbasis Keterampilan Proses Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 3(1), 49-63.

Sari, A.S.D., Prahani B.K., Munasir, & Jatmiko, B. (2018). The improvement of students physics problem solving skills through the implementation of PO2E2W learning model assisted PhET media. Journal Physics: Conference Series, 1108, 012024.

Slavin, R.E. (2011). Educational psychology, theory and practice. Boston: Pearson Education.

Stone, E.M. (2014). Guiding students to develop an understanding of scientific inquiry: A science skills approach to instruction and assessment. CBE Life Science Education, 13, 90-101.

Sudiarman, Soegimin, W.W., & Susantini, E. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran fisika berbasis inkuiri terbimbing untuk melatihkan keterampilan proses sains dan meningkatkan hasil belajar pada topik suhu dan perubahannya. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains, 4 (2), 636-647.

Sunarti, T., Wasis, Madlazim, Suyidno, & Prahani, B.K. (2018). The effectiveness of CPI model to improve positive attitude toward science (PATS) for pre-service physics teacher. Journal Physics: Conference Series, 997, 012013.

Suyidno, Nur, M., Yuanita, L., Prahani, B.K., & Jatmiko, B. (2018). Effectiveness of creative responsibility based teaching (CRBT) model on basic physics learning to increase student’s scientific creativity and responsibility. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(1), 136-151.

Suyono & Hariyanto. (2011). Belajar dan pembelajaran: teori dan konsep dasar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Zeidan, A.F., & Jayosi, M.R. (2015). Science process skills and attitudes toward science among Palestinian. World Journal of Education, 5(1), 13-24.

Published
2020-04-19
How to Cite
Iqbal Limatahu, & Husni Mubarok. (2020). CCDSR Learning Model: Innovation in Physics Learning. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 1(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v1i1.13
Section
Articles