Development STEM-Based Biotechnology Learning Tools to Practice Critical Thinking
Abstract
This study aims to describe the validity of learning tools in terms of several aspects such as content, language, and presentation. The method used in this research is to use a modified 4D (Define, Design, and Development), model and implemented in the Postgraduate Program for Science Education, State University of Surabaya. The data collection technique was carried out by the validation method. The assessment instrument uses a validation sheet. The tools developed are in the form of lesson plans, Student worksheet, and critical thinking ability tests. The validity of this STEM-based biotechnology learning tool is based on content feasibility, language feasibility, and presentation feasibility. Validity of STEM-based biotechnology learning tools were assessed by three validators consisting of two biology lecturers and one biology teacher. Data analysis was carried out quantitatively. The results of the validation of STEM-based biotechnology learning devices by three validators obtained an average score of 3.83 lesson plans, 3.67 Student worksheet, and 3.67 critical thinking ability test with a very valid category. Based on data analysis, it can be concluded that the learning tools developed are valid and suitable for use in learning
Abstract View: 449 
PDF Download: 349
Similarity Check Download: 49
Metrics
References
Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen perangkat pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Cooper, R., & Heaverlo, C. (2013). Problem solving and creavity and design: what influence do they have on girls’ interest in STEM subject areas? American Jorunal Of Engineriing Education, 4(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajee.v4i1.7856
Depdiknas. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Dewi, S. P. (2016).Kemampuan proses sains siswa melalui pendekatan saintifik dalam pembelajaran IPA terpadu pada tema global warming. Physics Education, and Cemistry Education Journal, 8(1), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i1.1564
English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(14), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7
Firman, H. (2016). Pendidikan STEM sebagai kerangka inovasi pembelajaran imia untuk meningkatkan daya saing bangsa dalam era masyarakat ekonomi ASEAN. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia Dan Pembelajarannya, 1-7.
Habibah, F. N., Widodo, A. T., & Jumaeri, J. (2017). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran kontekstual berpendekatan inkuiri terbimbing materi KSP. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 6(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v6i1.17066
Hamidah, H., Noer, S. H., & Caswita. (2017). Pengembangan LKPD berbasis kontekstual dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan disposisi matematis. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(10), 1–10.
Ibrahim, M. (2002). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Kuhlthau, C, C., Caspari, C., Ann, K., & Maniotes, L. (2017). Guide inquiry learning in the 21st century. London: Libraries.
Kurniawati, K. (2020). Analisis validitas isi instrumen tes berpikir kritis IPA kota yogyakarta. Foundasia, 11(1), 130-140. https://doi.org/10.33592/pelita.v21i1.1396
Mendikbud. (2014). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan republik indonesia nomor 58 tahun 2014 tentang kurikulum 2013 sekolah menengah pertama/ madrasah tsanawiyah. Jakarta: Mendikbud.
Mursalin, S. H., Odja, A. H., & Nuayi, A. W. (2021). Analisis perangkat pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD berbantuan grup facebook terhadap hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 24-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.36709/jipfi.v6i1.15177
Nabila, L. A., & Mareta, N. (2017). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis pendekatan kontekstual pada materi bangun datar berorientasi pada pemahaman konsep siswa kelas VII SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(7), 58–72.
Nur H, F., Hobri, H., & Suharto, S. (2014). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran matematika pada model “core” (connecting, organizing, reflecting, extending) dengan pendekatan kontekstual pokok bahasan peluang untuk siswa siswa kelas XI. Jurnal Kadikma, 5(2), 111–120.
Painprasert,N., & Jeerungsuwan, N. (2015). Factors supporting the STEM education learning management of leader teachers in the stem education network of thailand. Bangkok: International Conference On Elearning For Knowledge Society.
PISA. (2020). Assesment of reading, mathematical and scientific literacy. Australia: OECD.
Prastowo, A.(2015). Paduan kritis membuat bahan ajar inovatif. Yogyakarta: DIVA Press.
Putriadi, N. D., Suastra, I. W., & Adnyana, P. B. (2020). Pengembangan asesmen kinerja pada praktikum ipa berbasis pendekatan saintifik dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas VII SMP. Wahana Matematika Dan Sains: Jurnal Matematika, Sains, Dan Pembelajarannya, 14(2), 125-144. https://doi.org/10.23887/wms.v14i2.16120
Riduwan, R. (2012). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Bandung: alfabeta.
Rifaatul, M. (2015). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa SMP melalui pendekatan problem posing. Jurnal Peluang, 4(1), 64-73.
Rosnawati, R. (2015). A formative assessment model of critical thinking In mathematics learning in junior high school. Research and Evaluation in Education Journal, 1(2), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v1i2.6472
Siregar, E. (2020).Validitas perangkat pembelajaran dengan pendekatan kontekstual dalam upaya meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep. Akademika, 9(2), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.34005/akademika.v9i02.929
Sunhaji, S. (2014). Konsep manajemen kelas dan implikasinya dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Kependidikan, 2(2), 30-47. https://dx.doi.org/10.24090/jk.v2i2.551
Suwarma, I, R., Astuti, P., & Endah, N. E.(2015). Ballon powered car’ sebagai media pembelajaran IPA berbasis STEM. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Sains, 373-376.
Syahbana, A. (2012). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis kontekstual untuk mengukur kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa SMP. Edumatica, 2(2), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v2i02.841
Torlakson, T. (2014). Innovatic: A blueprint for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in carlifornia public education. California: State Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Thieman, W. J., & Palladino, M. A. (2014). Introduction to biotechnology. San Francisco: Pearson Education, Inc .
Wahyuni, E. S., & Ginting, E. M. (2012). The effect of problem based learning (pbl) model toward student’s critical thinking and problem solving ability in senior high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 5(6), 633-638. https://doi.org/10.22611/jpf.v6i2.8127
Yaghmale, F. (2013). Content validity and its estimation. Journal of Medical Education, 3(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v3i1.870
Yuniati, S. (2018). Perangkat pembelajaran matematika terintegrasi karakterkeislaman melalui pendekatan kontekstual di propinsi riau. MaPan : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 6(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2018v6n1a10
Zancul, E. S., Sausa-Zomer, T., & Cauchik-Miguel, P. A. (2017). Project based learning approach: Improvements of an undergraduate course in new product development. Production, 24, 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.225216
Copyright (c) 2022 IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 449 times
PDF downloaded = 349 times
Similarity Check downloaded = 49 times
