The Effectiveness of Using the SOLO Taxonomy in Acquiring Students the Concepts of Coordinate Geometry

  • Mohammad A. Ghunaimat Yarmouck University, Irbid,  Jordan
  • Esraa Ahmed Alawneh Ministry of Education, Irbid,  Jordan
Keywords: SOLO Taxonomy, Mathematics Education, Coordinate Geometry, Mathematical Concepts.


Objective: The study aimed to investigate the effect of using the SOLO taxonomy levels on Prince Faisal Technical College students' acquisition of coordinate geometry concepts. To achieve the study's objective, Method: The researcher developed a test of acquisition of coordinate geometry concepts. The study used the semi-experimental approach with a pre-post design, and it was applied to (51) students from the college, who were divided into two groups: one experimental (25) student studied using the SOLO taxonomy levels, and the other controlled (26) students studied in the usual way. Results showed a positive effect of using the SOLO taxonomy as a strategy for teaching mathematics, especially in students' acquisition of concepts of coordinate geometry. The study recommended using the SOLO Taxonomy levels on students' acquisition of mathematical concepts in other fields such as algebra, statistics, etc. Novelty: This research presents novelty through the use of Solo taxonomy levels of classification in teaching mathematics, designing a teaching strategy to enable students to acquire concepts of coordinate geometry so that it is easy for teachers to implement this strategy in teaching mathematics.

Abstract View: 93 PDF Download: 76 Similarity Check Download: 11
Download data is not yet available.


Abrahamson, D., Nathan, M. J., Williams-Pierce, C., Walkington, C., Ottmar, E. R., Soto, H., & Alibali, M. W. (2020). The future of embodied design for mathematics teaching and learning. Frontiers in Education, 5, 1–29.

Adeniji, S. M., Baker, P., & Schmude, M. (2022). Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) model: A mixed-method systematic review of research in mathematics education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(6), 1-10.

Agustyaningrum, N., Sari, R. N., Abadi, A. M., & Mahmudi, A. (2020). Dominant factors that cause students’ difficulties in learning abstract algebra: A case study at a university in indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 847–866.

Al Maani, D., & Shanti, Z. (2023). Technology-enhanced learning in light of bloom’s taxonomy: A student-experience study of the history of architecture course. Sustainability, 15(3), 1-23.

Andrade, R. R., & Pasia, A. E. (2020). Mathematical creativity of pre-service teachers in solving non-routine problems in state university in laguna. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4555–4567.

Apawu, J., Owusu-Ansah, A. N., & Peter, P. (2018). A study on the algebraic working processes of senior high school students in ghana. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 62-68.

Augusto, C., Suarez, H., Rodrigo, W., Castro, A., Aloiso, A., & Suárez, G. (2022). Development of variational thinking based on non-routine problem-solving in elementary school students. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(2), 1133–1142.

Azid, N., Ali, R. M., El Khuluqo, I., Purwanto, S. E., & Susanti, E. N. (2022). Higher order thinking skills, school-based assessment and students’ mathematics achievement: Understanding teachers’ thoughts. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(1), 290–302.

Banda, S., Phiri, F., Kaale, J., Banda, A. M., Mpolomoka, D. L., & Chikopela, R. (2023). Application of bloom’s taxonomy in categorization of cognitive process development in colleges. Journal of Education and Practice, 14(4), 6-14.

Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. The Society for research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the observed learning outcome). Academic Press.

Bosse, M. J., Bayaga, A., Lynch-Davis, K., & DeMarte, A. (2021). Assessing analytic geometry understanding: Van hiele, SOLO, and beyond. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 22(1), 1–23.

Bounou, A., Lavidas, K., Komis, V., Papadakis, S., & Manoli, P. (2023). Correlation between high school students’ computational thinking and their performance in STEM and language courses. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1-10.

Caniglia, J. Meadows, M (2018). An application of the solo taxonomy to classify strategies used by pre-service Teachers to solve "one Question problems. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(9), 75-89.

Chan, C. C., Chui, M. S., & Chan, M. Y. C. (2002). Applying the structure of the observed learning outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy on student’s learning outcomes: an empirical study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(6), 511-527.

Chirove, M., & Ogbonnaya, U. I. (2021). The relationship between grade 11 learners’ procedural and conceptual knowledge of algebra. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 6(4), 368–387.

Egodawatte, G. (2023). A taxonomy of high school students’ levels of understanding in solving algebraic problems. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 42(1), 30–51.

Elazzabi, A. & Kaçar, A. (2020). Investigation of libyan and turkish students' thinking levels in solving quadratic word problems based on SOLO Taxonomy. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 10(1), 283-316.

Feldman-Maggor, Y., Tuvi-Arad, I., & Blonder, R. (2022). Development and evaluation of an online course on nanotechnology for the professional development of chemistry teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 44(16), 2465–2484.

Gözde, A. (2020). Non-routine problem-solving performances of mathematics teacher candidates. Educational Research and Reviews, 15(5), 214–224.

Hamdan, H., Majdouba, M., & Nour, N. (2018). The effect of using the flipped classroom strategy and Solo mock maps on the learning and achievement of seventh grade students in mathematics. The Seventh International Conference of the College of Arts: Future Prospects for Education in a Changing World, 1-8.

Hook, P. (2015). First Steps with SOLO Taxonomy Applying the model in your classroom. Essential Resources Educational Publishers Limited.

Jaiswal, P., & Al-Hattami, A. A. (2020). Enhancing learners’ academic performances using student centered approaches. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(16), 4–16.

Karanja, E., & Malone, L. C. (2021). Improving project management curriculum by aligning course learning outcomes with Bloom’s taxonomy framework. Journal of International Education in Business, 14(2), 197–218.

Kilicoglu, E., & Kaplan, A. (2022). Predicting the mathematical abstraction processes using the revised bloom’s taxonomy: Secondary school 7th graders. Athens Journal of Education, 9(2), 237–256.

Koyunlu, U. Z., & Dökme, İ. (2022). A systematic review of 5E model in science education: proposing a skill-based STEM instructional model within the 21-st century skills. International Journal of Science Education, 44(13), 2110–2130.

Ladias, A., Karvounidis, T., & Ladias, D. (2021). Classification of the programming styles in scratch using the SOLO taxonomy. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(2), 114-123.

Ladias, A., Karvounidis, T., & Ladias, D. (2022). Forms of communications in scratch and the SOLO taxonomy. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(1), 234-245.

Leow, S. H., & Kaur, B. (2024). A study of grade two students solving a non-routine problem with access to manipulatives. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-23.

Mehmet I,. & Yilmaz. G. (2021). An investigation of the geometric thinking levels of middle school mathematics preservice teachers according to SOLO taxonomy: "Social distance problems". Participatory Educational Research, 8(3), 188-209.

Muhayimana, T., Kwizera, L., & Nyirahabimana, M. R. (2022). Using bloom’s taxonomy to evaluate the cognitive levels of primary leaving english exam questions in rwandan schools. Curriculum Perspectives, 42(1), 51–63.

Mulbar, U., Rahman, A., & Ahmar, A. (2018). Analysis of the ability in mathematical problem-solving based on SOLO taxonomy and cognitive style. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(1), 68-73.

Parissi, M., Komis, V., Dumouchel, G., Lavidas, K., & Papadakis, S. (2023). How does students' knowledge about information-seeking improve their behavior in solving information problems? Educational Process: International Journal, 12(1), 113-137.

Singh, G., Singh, G., Tuli, N., & Mantri, A. (2023). Hyperspace AR: An augmented reality application to enhance spatial skills and conceptual knowledge of students in trigonometry. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1-20.

Ukobizaba, F., Nizeyimana, G., & Mukuka, A. (2021). Assessment strategies for enhancing students’ mathematical problem-solving skills: A review of literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(3), 1–10.

How to Cite
Ghunaimat, M. A., & Alawneh, E. A. (2024). The Effectiveness of Using the SOLO Taxonomy in Acquiring Students the Concepts of Coordinate Geometry. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 5(3), 523-536.
Abstract viewed = 93 times
PDF downloaded = 76 times Similarity Check downloaded = 11 times