Analysis of Student Creativity Assessment Instruments: Supporting SDGs and MBKM in Higher Education
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to produce a valid and reliable Creativity Assessment Instrument that can be used in learning. Students' low creative thinking ability and the unavailability of a Creativity Assessment Instrument to measure creativity in the science field of elementary school students are the background to this study. Method: The instrument was compiled through the following stages: potential and problems, data collection, product design, design validation, design revision, and valid and reliable final results. Data were collected using a validation sheet. Data from the validation results were then analyzed quantitatively descriptively and then compared with the validity criteria table that had been set. As a result, the creativity assessment instrument has been designed to measure creative thinking skills using descriptive questions. Results: Assessment of the material, construction, and language aspects showed high and reliable validity in the categories. This shows that the instrument can be used in the context of learning to measure student creativity effectively. There has been an increase in the development of creativity assessment instruments to measure students' creative thinking skills in elementary school science subjects, which were previously lacking but are now increasing due to this research. Novelty: For further development research, it is recommended that creativity assessment instruments have broader topics and are also equipped with Student Worksheets that can not only measure creative thinking skills but also measure the creative process and creative products.
Abstract View: 143 
PDF Download: 79
Similarity Check Download: 8
Metrics
References
Alshammari, A. S., Alsahou, H. J., & Alshemmari, J. M. (2020). Views of trainee science teachers in Kuwait regarding the NoS dimensions and their conception of creativity in science education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 8(12), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v8i12.5073
Amelia, T., Jumini, S., & Khoiri, A. (2021). Analysis of creativity and attitudes caring the environment of junior high school students: Study of environmental physics learning using learning modules. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 17(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v17i1.26301
Anwar, P. I., Rifai, H., Ferdinal, F., Zulaikah, S., Husna, H., Lisa, T. D. P., & Fitriani, D. (2023). Study of physics concepts in cave exploration activities to develop physics edupark digital book for senior high school students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 4431–4442. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3408
Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
Ayaz, E., & Sarikaya, R. (2021). The effect of engineering design-based science teaching on decision making, scientific creativity, and design skills of classroom teacher candidates. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 7(4), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.961060
Bae, J., Choi, M., Jang, Y., Park, C. G., & Lee, Y. J. (2023). Development of the clinical reasoning competency scale for nurses. BMC Nursing, 22(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01244-6
Can, I., & Burakgazi, S. G. (2022). Training primary school science teachers to be conscious of scientific creativity. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 30(3), 657–668. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi-2021-0007
Damanik, N. N. (2022). Pengembangan instrumen tes berfikir kreatif tingkat tinggi pada siswa SMP. Thesis. Universitas HKBP Nommensen.
Darfler, M., & Kalantari, S. (2022). A synthetic review of evaluation expectation and its effects on creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101111
Dawana, I. R., & Dwikoranto, D. (2024). Characteristics of high school physics problem-solving skills and integrating the PBL model assisted by e-book. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 12(1), 30–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v12i1.8467
Dwikoranto, D., Jatmiko, B., Hariyono, E., Lestari, N. A., Prahani, B. K., & Suyidno, S. (2021). MobLen model for enhancing scientific creativity of physics students: An alternative in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1805, 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1805/1/012006
Dwikoranto, D., Madlazim, M., & Erman, E. (2018). Validity of project-based laboratory learning: An innovative physics laboratory learning to prepare science process skills and creativity of physics teacher candidates. Atlantis Highlights in Engineering: Proceedings, 1, 912–917. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icst-18.2018.184
Dwikoranto, D., Madlazim, M., & Erman, E. (2019). Project-based laboratory learning as an alternative learning model to improve science process skills and creativity of physics teacher candidates. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1387, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012074
Dwikoranto, D., Surasmi, S., Suparti, W. A., & Setiani, R. (2024). Assessing the validity and effectiveness of student worksheets and creativity tests in enhancing the creativity of Open University students. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 12(2), 376–389. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v12i2.9979
El-sehrawy, M. G. (2020). Developing and validating an instrument for evaluating research protocols. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science (IOSR-JNHS, 9(4), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.9790/1959-0904011017
Elangovan, N., & Sundaravel, E. (2021). Method of preparing a document for survey instrument validation by experts. MethodsX, 8, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101326
Ernaningsih, D. S. (2019). Analisis kemampuan berfikir kreatif siswa di SMP Negeri 1 Maumere. Jurnal BIOS, 4(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v8i4.8473
Fakhirah, N. L., Darmiany, & Astria, F. P. (2023). Analisis kemampuan berfikir kreatif siswa pada mata pelajaran IPA kelas IV di SDN 36 Cakranegara. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 8(1), 719–733. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v8i1b.1273
Faresta, R. A., Anggara, W., Mandiri, T. A., & Septiawan, A. (2020). Pengembangan instrumen tes kemampuan berfikir kreatif berbasis pendekatan konflik kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi dan Geofisika, 1(2), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceedu.v1i2.55
Guilford, J. P. (2019). Development of Torrance Test Creativity Thinking (TTCT) instrument in science learning. Creativity in American Psychology, 5, 444–454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5139861
Kadarisman, I., Pursitasari, I. D., & Jaenudin, D. (2023). Ecoliteracy of junior high school students through phenomenon-based learning on the interaction of living things with the environment. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9075–9086. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5180
Kamila, K., Wilujeng, I., Jumadi, J., & Ungirwalu, S. Y. (2024). Analysis of integrating local potential in science learning and its effect on 21st-century skills and student cultural awareness: Literature review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.6485
Lukman, H. S. (2023). Pengembangan instrumen tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis berdasarkan teori Krulik dan Rudnick analisis validitas konten. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.1761
Masuwai, A., Zulkifli, H., & Hamzah, M. I. (2024). Evaluation of content validity and face validity of secondary school Islamic education teacher self-assessment instrument. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2308410
Maysyaroh, S., & Dwikoranto, D. (2021). Kajian pengaruh model Project-Based Learning terhadap keterampilan berpikir kreatif peserta didik pada pembelajaran fisika. ORBITA: Jurnal Hasil Kajian, Inovasi, dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 44–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v7i1.4433
Nizam. N. (2020). Panduan merdeka belajar kampus merdeka. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kemendikbud RI.
Nurlaela, L. I. (2019). Strategi belajar berfikir kreatif (Edisi Revisi). PT. Mediaguru Digital Indonesia.
Nursiwan, W. A., & Hanri, C. (2023). Relationship between level of scientific creativity and scientific attitudes among prospective chemistry teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 12(1), 174-188. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.22852
Roebianto, A., Sriyanto, A. S., Savitri, I., & Syaiful, I. A. (2023). Content validity: Definition and procedure of content validation in psychological research. TPM, 30(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM30.1.1
Samadun, S., & Dwikoranto. (2022). Improvement of students’ critical thinking abilities in physics materials through the application of problem-based learning. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 3(5), 534–545. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i5.247
Sari, I. Y., & Manurung, A. S. (2021). Pengaruh penggunaan media pembelajaran berbasis animasi Powtoon terhadap peningkatan kemampuan berfikir kreatif siswa kelas III SDN Gudang Tigaraksa. JIP: Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 2(3), 1015–1024. https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v2i3.809
Surya, A. D., Sumarno, S., & Muhtarom, M. (2023). Analisis kualitas instrumen tes hasil belajar IPAS materi wujud zat dan perubahannya. Fondatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 7(2), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v7i2.3190
Syaiful, I. A. (2020). Adapting and examining the factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale in Indonesian version. Jurnal Psikologi, 47(3), 175–205. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.57608
Tangkin, W. P. (2019). Pemanfaatan rubrik sebagai instrumen penilaian alternatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 9(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2019.v9.i1.p29-39
Yuliarto, H. (2021). Analisis Indeks Aiken untuk mengukur validitas isi instrumen komitmen tugas bermain sepakbola. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia, 17(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpji.v17i1.38777
Copyright (c) 2025 IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 143 times
PDF downloaded = 79 times
Similarity Check downloaded = 8 times
