Increase Self-Regulated Learning of Junior High School  Students with the Experiential Seamless Learning Model

Sri Catur Purnawati; Yatim Riyanto; Bachtiar Sjaiful Bachri; Hanandita Veda Saphira

doi:10.46245/ijorer.v6i2.801

Sri Catur Purnawati State University of Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Yatim Riyanto State University of Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Bachtiar Sjaiful Bachri State University of Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Hanandita Veda Saphira University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v6i2.801

Keywords: Experiential Seamless Learning, Junior High School Students, Self-Regulated Learning

Abstract

Objective: Study this to increase participants' self-regulated learning abilities and educate junior high school level through implementing the Experiential Seamless Learning model. Method: The research method used is the ADDIE development model proposed by Branch, involving 66 participants educated as subject research. Data was collected through a questionnaire to evaluate the eligibility product and test used to measure its effectiveness. Data analysis was done using a difference test (independent sample t-test). Results: The results of the study show that the Experiential Seamless Learning model, in a way, can significantly enhance participants' self-regulated learning education. Analysis indicates a significant difference between classes implementing this model and those using the learning method. The average value of self-regulated learning in classes using the Experiential Seamless Learning model is higher compared to class. Novelty: The novelty aspect of this study lies in the systematic integration between two learning models, experiential learning and seamless learning, which in previous studies were still applied separately. Another innovation of the Experiential Seamless Learning model is its use in improving self-regulated learning in the context of learning Indonesian at the junior high school level. The limitations of this study lie in the scope of the subject, which involved only two classes with a total of 66 students. In addition, the application of this model only covers seven of the ten dimensions of mobile seamless learning.

Abstract View: 104

PDF Download: 67

Similarity Check Download: 15

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Aida, A. S., & Norhayati, H. (2018). Industrial revolution 4.0 and education. International, 314–319.

Alperi, M. (2019). Sigil digital teaching materials to prepare students for learning independence. Jurnal Teknodik, 23, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v0i1.479

Djamaluddin, A., & Wardana, W. (2019). Learning and teaching. Kaaffah Learning Center.

Febriyanti, F. (2021). Analysis of self-regulated learning in mathematics learning. Jurnal Edukasi Ilmiah Soulmath, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.25139/smj.v9i1.3300

Friskilia, O., & Winata, H. (2018, January). Self-regulation as a determinant of student learning outcomes. Journal of Office Management Education, 3(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpm.v3i1.9454

Gleason, N. W. (2018). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and higher education. Palgrave Macmillan.

Harahap, D. P. (2023). Improving self-regulated learning in students through strategies. Journal of Education, 5(3), 7056–7068.

Himmetoğlu, H., & Ayduğ, A. (2020). Education 4.0: Defining the teacher, the student, and the school. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21, 12-28. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770896

Intan, S., I, N. S. D., Punaji, S., & Saida, U. (2020). Design and development of seamless learning to improve Islamic economic course learning outcomes: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(3), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135249

Kuncahyono, K. (2018). Development of e-modules (digital modules) in thematic learning in elementary schools. Journal of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Education, 219–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.32934/jmie.v2i2.75

Kusuma, & Nurmawanti. (2023). The Problem-Based Learning (PBL) strategy influences students' metacognitive skills and problem-solving abilities. Scientific Journal of Educational Profession, 1922–1934. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v8i3.1890

Lase, D. (2024). Education in the era of Industrial Revolution 4.0. Sundermann: Scientific Journal of Theology, Education, Science, Humanities and Culture, 28–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.24114/jh.v10i1

Lendeon, G. R. (2022, June). The influence of the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model. Screening: Science Learning Journal, 3, 14–21. https://doi.org/10.53682/slj.v3i1.1076

Li, C. H. (2019). Gamification of an asynchronous HTML5-related. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 658(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/658/1/012004

McKnight, K., O'Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856

Natalia, L., & Nieto-Márquez. (2020). Assessment of the effects of digital educational material on executive function performance. Frontiers in Education, 5, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.545709

Nurfadhilah, A. A., Ningsih, E. S., Nurrohmawati, N., Wilujeng, V. R., Nazakia, A., & Muhtarom. (2025). Literature study of experiential learning implementation to improve student independence. IndoMathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 6(1), 350–360. https://doi.org/10.54373/imeij.v6i1.2348

Octaviani, N. (2015). Experiential learning to improve creative thinking skills and student activities. Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University.

Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

Putri, T. D. (2025). Traditional and contemporary learning models in education. Journal of Educational Science Innovation, 3, 304–312. https://doi.org/10.55606/lencana.v3i1.4579

Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2018). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Pearson Education.

Reiser, R. A. (2017). A history of instructional design and technology: Part II. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504928

Rina, & Hotimah. (2023). Application of meaningful learning in history education. Culture Journal, 1, 1–15.

Riskar, Nur, Asmara, & Sa'diyah. (2024). Learning strategy 5.0. Mafy Indonesian Literacy Media.

Salim, A., Herpratiwi, H., & Firdaus, F. (2024). Utilization of platform-based learning management systems. Didaktika, 4(4), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.17509/didaktika.v4i4.76616

Samsinar, S. (2019). The urgency of learning resources in improving education. Journal of Education, 13(2), 194–205. Retrieved from https://jurnal.iain-bone.ac.id/index.php/didaktika/article/download/959/662

Sinaga, S., & Firmansyah, F. (2024). Changes in educational paradigms in the digital era. Journal of Educational Technology, 1(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.47134/jtp.v1i4.492

Suci, E. H. (2024). The relationship between self-regulated learning and skills. Journal of Education, Social and Humanities, 3(2), 427–434. http://dx.doi.org/10.56799/peshum.v3i2.3130

Sudinadji, M. B., & Kumaidi, K. (2019). Students' self-regulated learning experiences to face exams. Scientific Journal of Psychology, 4(2), 79–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.13.6

Sugiyono. (2021). Communication research methods. Alfabeta.

Wahab, G., & Rosnawati. (2021). Theories of learning and teaching. Adanu Abimata. Retrieved from http://www.penerbitadab.id/

Wiedarti, P. (2018). The importance of understanding learning styles. General of Elementary and Secondary Education.

Winarti, P., Sari, F., Jannah, M., Manubay, J., Darmanto, O. G., Tedy, R. G., & Widayati, S. (2023). Learning evaluation. Graha Mitra Edukasi. Retrieved from https://repository.usahid.ac.id/2709/1/Buku%20-%20Evaluasi%20Pembelajaran%20-%20Tatan_Sukwika.pdf

Winaryati, E. (2021). Circular model of RD & D. KBM Indonesia Publisher.