Using Toulmin's Argument Pattern on Problem Solving Model to Improve Problem-Solving Analysis Ability: Learning  Alternatives During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Dwikoranto Dwikoranto

doi:10.46245/ijorer.v3i2.211

Dwikoranto Dwikoranto Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i2.211

Keywords: Analysis Ability, Learning Alternatives, Problem Solving, Toulmin's Argument Pattern

Abstract

The lecture process even in the Covid-19 pandemic must continue. The right of students to obtain good teaching must still be fulfilled. Lectures are conducted online using the Zoom, WhatsApp, Google Drive, Google Form platforms. The platform is assembled in a problem solving model with Toulmin's Argument Pattern. Problem solving analytical skills are the main focus of the Statistics course. This study aims to improve students' analytical problem solving skills, describe their improvement and describe student responses with Toulmin's Argument Pattern in problem solving models. The research design used a one group pre-test and post-test design. The research subjects were 30 students of the Unesa Physics Department. The instruments used in collecting data include: (1) problem solving analysis ability test sheets, (2) student response questionnaires. The research data scores that have been collected after going through a series of prerequisite tests, normality tests and homogeneity tests are then analyzed using paired t-tests to find out if there are differences in pre-test scores and post-test scores for solving analytical skills. student problems. The mean level of improvement in pre-test scores and post-test scores was calculated using normalized gain. The results showed an increase in problem-solving analytical skills in the medium and high categories. Student responses in lectures were very positive.

Abstract View: 491

PDF Download: 428

Similarity Check Download: 41

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Acar, O. & Patton, B. R. (2012). Argumentation and formal reasoning skills in an argumentation-based guided inquiry course. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 46(2012), 4756 – 4760. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2012.06.331

Akarsu, B., Bayram, K. Slisko, J. & Cruz, A. C. (2013). Understanding elementary students’ argumentation skills through discrepant event marbles in the Jar. International Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 6(3), 221-232.

Arifin, Z. (2015). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan, filosofi, teori, & aplikasinya. Surabaya: Lentera Cendekia.

Bilgin, I. (2015). The effect of different problem-solving strategies on university students’ problem-solving achievements of quantitative problems in chemistry. Turkey: Faculty of Education, Department of Elementary Education Gölköy-Bolu.

Dahar, R. W. (2016). Teori-Teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Demircioglu, T. & Ucar, S. (2015). Investigating the effect of argument-driven inquiry in laboratory. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(1), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.1.2324

Dorongin, F. (2017). Kurikulum baru keterampilan abad 21 dan implementasinya. PGSD Binus. https://pgsd.binus.ac.id

Duschl, R. & Osborne, J. (2014). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187

Erduran, S., Shirley S. & Osborne J. (2014). Tapping into argumentation developments in the application of toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(November), 915-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/SCE.20012

Faqih, A. & Lukiyadi L. (2014) Revitalisasi mata kuliah statistika program S1 PGSD untuk mendukung penyiapan kompetensi profesional calon lulusan. Project Report. Surabaya: Universitas Terbuka.

Handayani, P. & Murniati S. (2015). Analisis argumentasi peserta didik kelas x sma muhammadiyah 1 Palembang dengan menggunakan model argumentasi toulmin. Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 2(1), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.36706/jipf.v2i1.2355

Herlianti, Y., Rustaman, N. Y., Rohman, I. & Fitriani, A. (2012). Kualitas argumentasi pada diskusi isu sosio saintifik mikrobiologi melalui weblog. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia (JPII), 1(2), 168-177. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v1i2.2135

Junianto, D. (2015). Pengaruh kinerja mengajar guru, keterlibatan orang tua, aktualisasi diri, terhadap motivasi berprestasi. Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 22(3), 307-314. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v3i3.1845

Josef T., Eva T. & Jiri S. (2012). Implementation of inquiry-based science education in science teacher training. Journal Of Educational And Instructional Studies In The World, 2(4), 23.

Khodijah, S., Murni, M. & Riezky R. (2015). Action research untuk memperbaiki kemampuan argumentasi siswa sma melalui desain pembelajaran berbasis inquiry dipadu assesment for learning (afl). Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2(1), 6.

Maya, R., Murni R., Harlita, H., Meti I. & Sajidan. (2016). Profil keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa pendidikan biologi fkp UNS pada mata kuliah anatomi tumbuhan. Bioedukasi, 9(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v9i1.3880

Meghan, B., Amanda C., Christian S., Mac C., & Rena D. (2015). The learning benefits of being willing and able to engage in scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590-1621. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1045958

Nitko, A.J. & Brookhart, S.M. (2017). Educational assessmentof students. 5th edition. Colombus: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Nurlela, A. (2018). Pembelajaran model pemecahan masalah berbasis eksperimen pada materi pengaruh suhu terhadap kelarutan. Thesis. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Tidak diterbitkan.

Bambang, R. (2015). Pembelajaran berbasis masalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi matematis mahasiswa. Program Studi Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 4(2), 123-.

Rosbiono, M. (2017). Teori Problem solving untuk sains. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Depdiknas.

Sagala, S. (2014). Konsep dan makna pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfa Beta.

Sampson, Victor, P. E., & friends. (2016). Argument driven inquiry in physical science. USA: National Science Teachers Association Press.

Setyowati, T. & Pramonoadi, A. M. (2019). Peningkatan kompetensi kemampuan pemecahan masalah matakuliah tap melalui pemberian guiding question model problem solving mahasiswa pg-paud di pokjar Bojonegoro. Laporan Penelitian: Universitas Terbuka.

Soekismo, R. & Bambang A. (2015). Pembelajaran berbasis masalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi matematis mahasiswa. Program Studi Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 4(2), 120-140. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v4i2.p120-139

Sugandi, S. R. (2015). Pengaruh penggunaan pola argumentasi toulmin pada pembelajaran fisika melalui metode diskusi terhadap peningkatan pemahaman konsep dan kualitas argumentasi sains peserta didik sma. Thesis. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R & D, Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tambunan, H. (2014). Strategi heuristik dalam pemecahan masalah matematika sekolah. Jurnal Saintech, 6(4), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.36655/sepren.v1i02.209

Tolga G. (2010). The general assessment of problem solving processes and metacognition in physics education. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 2(2), 110-122. https://doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v2i2.186

Tresnaningsih, S. (2013). Problem solving solusi perkuliahan matematika. Laporan Penelitian. Surabaya: UPBJJ-UT.

Victor S., Joi, P. H. & Jonathan, G. (2016). Argument driven inquiry in undergraduate chemistry labs: the impact on student's conceptual undesrtanding, argument skills, and attitudes toward science. Journal of College Science Teaching 41(4), 82-89.