The Effectiveness of the Creative-Scientific Decision Making Skills (CSDMS) Model to Practice Creative Thinking Skills and Decision Making Skills
Abstract
This study aims to produce an effective Creative-Scientific Decision Making Skills (CSDMS) learning model that can be used in training students' creative thinking skills and decision-making skills. This study uses the One Group Pretest – Posttest design. Data were analyzed descriptively with pre-test and post-test data analysis using paired t-test in limited trials, and independent t-test in broad trials. It was concluded that the CSDMS model was declared valid both in terms of content validity and construct validity in order to improve students' creative thinking skills and decision-making skills. The results showed that the CSDMS model met the effective criteria in terms of the average n-gain of creative thinking skills in the high category and decision-making skills in the medium category, consistent with the average n-gain not significantly different in each university. It was concluded that the CSDMS model was found to be effective in improving students' creative thinking skills and decision-making skills.



Metrics
References
Ayas, M. B., & Sak, U. (2014). Objective measure of scientific creativity: Psychometric validity of the creative scientific ability test. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 195–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.001
Boehm, R. G. & Webb, B. (2002). Skills handbook using social studies. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cancer & Mulej. (2015). Multi-crieteria decision making in creative problem solving. Kybernetes, 42(1), 67 -81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03684921311295484
Celik, M. (2017). Examination of children decision making using clues during the logical reasoning process. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(16), 783-788. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2017.3297
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gains score. USA: Woodland Hills.
Handayani A. S., Rahayu. S. Y., & Agustini R. (2020). Improving students' creative thinking skills through google classroom assisted GO_KAR model during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 13(12), 4616 – 4621.
Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary student, International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912
Malik A., Nuraeni Y., Samsudin A., & Sutarno, S. (2019). Creative thinking skill of students on harmonic vibration using model student fasilitator and explaining (SFAE). Jornal Education Phisics, 8(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v8i1.3056
Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (1998). Dimension of thinking a framework for curriculum and instruction. Virginia: Assosiation for Supervisions and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Ramankulova, S., Usembaeva, I., & Berdi, D., (2016). Formation of the Creativity of Students in the Context of the Education Informatization. International Journal of Environmental Science Education, 11(16), 9598-9613.
Santrock, S. (2011). Educational psychology, Fifth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Suryanti, S. (2012). Profil kemampuan berpikir pengambilan keputusan berdasarkan IPA siswa SD. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains 2012 Re-Orientasi Pembelajaran Sains, 78-82.
Vrchota J., Svarova M., (2015). Comparison of decision-making sklils of students and managers. Acta Universitas Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(118), 1073–1077. http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563031073
Copyright (c) 2022 IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


