Profile of Students' Misconceptions on Substance Pressure Using a Three-tier Diagnostic Test
Abstract
Research aims to find out misconceptions experienced by students on the subject matter of substance pressure. This type of research is quantitative descriptive research using a survey method. The instrumental test used was a three-tier diagnostic test to determine the under-examined misconceptions. The research sample consisted of 43 junior high school students who had previously received substance-pressure learning materials in class. The data were analyzed by categorizing them into understanding the concept, needing more knowledge, errors, and misconception. The results of the study were as follows: (1) 9% of the students understood the concept, 51% of the students had a misconception, 34% of the students were lack of knowledge, and 6% of the students had some errors (2) misconceptions with the highest percentage were in the sub-concept of pressure gases with an average percentage of 70%, then the pressure of liquids (capillarity and osmosis in plant stems) was 52%, the pressure of solids was 51%.



Metrics
References
Ardiansyah, A., Dirgantara, Y., Agustina, R. D., & Sugilar, H. (2019). Penerapan model pembelajaran ECIRR (elicit, confront, identify, resolve, reinforce) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah peserta didik pada materi fluida statis. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 10(1), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.3.444-450
Campbell, N. A., & Reece, J. B. (2010). Biologi (8th ed.). Erlangga.
Giancoli, D. (2014). Fisika: Prinsip dan aplikasi (5th ed.). Erlangga.
Gurbuz, F. (2016). Physics education: Effect of micro-teaching method supported by educational technologies on pre-service science teachers’ misconceptions on basic astronomy subjects. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(2), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i2.1140
Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 989-1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a
Handayani, L., Nugroho, S. E., Rohidi, T. R., & Wiyanto, W. (2019). Analog-analog pilihan siswa untuk cahaya merambat lurus. Prosiding Seminar Nasional The 5th Lontar Physics Forum 2019, 1-9.
Idayanti, I., Darsono, T., & Naini, M., B. (2019). Pengembangan tes diagnostik menggunakan certainty of response index (CRI) termodifikasi pada materi tekanan zat untuk siswa kelas viii smp. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 8(1), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v8i1.29503
Kiray, S. A., & Simsek, S. (2021). Determination and evaluation of the science teacher candidates' misconceptions about density by using a four-tier diagnostic test. International Journal Science Mathematic Education, 19(5), 935-955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10087-5
Laksana, D. N. L. (2016). Miskonsepsi dalam materi IPA sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(2), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v5i2.8588
Laliyo, L. A. R. (2019). The development of two-tier instrument based on distractor to assess conceptual understanding level and student misconceptions in explaining redox reactions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(9), 216-237. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.9.12
Liampa, V., Malandrakis, G. N., Papadopoulou, P., & Pnevmatikos, P. (2019). Development and evaluation of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess undergraduate primary teachers’ understanding of ecological footprint. Research Science Education, 49(3), 711-736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9643-1
Malikha, Z., & Amir, M. F. (2018). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa kelas V-B min buduran sidoarjo pada materi pecahan ditinjau dari kemampuan matematika. Pi: Mathematics Education Journal, 1(2), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.21067/pmej.v1i2.2329
Mufidah, I., & Budiarto, M. T. (2018). Miskonsepsi siswa SMP dalam memahami konsep bangun datar segiempat ditinjau dari gaya belajar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(7), 232-239.
Mulyastuti, H., Setyarsih, W., & Mukhayyarotin, N. R. J. (2016). Profil reduksi miskonsepsi siswa materi dinamika rotasi sebagai pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran ecirr berbantuan media audiovisual. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika (JIPF), 5(2), 82-84. https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v5n2.p%25p
Munawaroh, F., & Falahi, M. D. (2016). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa sdn kemayoran 1 bangkalan pada konsep cahaya menggunakan CRI (certainty of response index). Jurnal Pena Sains, 3(1), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.21107/jps.v3i1.1770
Mustikasari, V. R., Annisa, M., & Munzil, M. (2017). Identifikasi miskonsepsi konsep tekanan zat kelas viii-c smpn 1 karangploso semester genap tahun pelajaran 2017-2018. Jurnal Pembelajaran Sains, 1(2), 39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um033v1i2p39-50
Nadelson, L. S., Heddy, B. C., Jones, S., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Johnson, M. (2018). Conceptual change in science teaching and learning: Introducing the dynamic model of conceptual change. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(2), 153-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2018.3249
Nurrohmah, E. S., Susilaningsih, E., & Nuswowati, M. (2018). Instrument design diagnostic test three-tier multiple choice redox material with redox diagnostic test software (RDT). Journal of Innovative Science Education, 7(2), 190-199. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v7i2.24147
Palisoa, N., Suyono., & Agustini, R. (2021). Strategi conceptual change terintegrasi recall memfasilitasi proses terjadinya konflik kognitif dan reduksi beban miskonsepsi mahasiswa calon guru kimia. MjoCE, 11(1), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.30598/MJoCEvol11iss1pp17-23
Prastiwi, A. C., Kholiq, A., & Setyarsih, W. (2017). Implementation of ECIRR model based on virtual simulation media to reduce students' misconception on kinetic theory of gases. Seminar Nasional Fisika (SNF) 2017, 1-10.
Prayitno, T. A., & Hidayati, N. (2022). Analysis of students’ misconception on general biology concepts using four-tier diagnostic test (FTDT). International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 3(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i1.177
Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Hertina, A. M. (2019). The misconception diagnosis on ionic and covalent bonds concepts with three tier diagnostic test. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1477-1488. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12194a
Putri, W. O., Maria, H. T., & Hamdani, H. (2021). Analisis miskonsepsi menggunakan four-tier diagnostic test berbantuan google form pada materi tekanan zat. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(6), 4738-4749. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i6.1445
Putro, T. I., Ariani, S. R. D., & Yamtinah, S. (2019). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa dengan two-tier diagnostic test dilengkapi certainty of response index (CRI) pada topik materi hidrolisis garam sebagian. Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia, 4(2), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v4i2.34325
Rukmana, D. (2017). Identifikasi miskonsepsi pada materi prinsip archimedes di smk dengan menggunakan tes diagnostik pilihan ganda tingkat tiga. Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v2i2.8276
Saputra, O., Setiawan, A., & Rusdiana, D. (2018). Identification of student misconception about static fluid. Hosted by International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE 2018), 1-10.
Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2009). Fisika untuk sains dan teknik (6th ed.). Salemba Teknika.
Setiawan, D., Cahyono, E., & Kurniawan, C. (2017). Identifikasi dan analisis miskonsepsi pada materi ikatan kimia menggunakan instrumen tes diagnostik three-tier. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 6(2), 197-204. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v6i2.15580
Shofiyah, N. (2017). Penerapan model pembelajaran modifed free inquiry untuk mereduksi miskonsepsi mahasiswa pada materi fluida. Science Education Journal, 1(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.21070/sej.v1i1.836
Soeharto, S., & Csapo, B. (2021). Evaluating item difficulty patterns for assessing student misconceptions in science across physics, chemistry, and biology concepts. Heliyon, 7, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08352
Soeharto, S., Csapo, B., Sarimanah, E., Dewi, F. I., & Sarbi, T. (2019). A review of students’ common misconceptions in science and their diagnostic assessment tools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 247-267. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.18649
Soeharto, S., & Csapo, B. (2022). Exploring indonesian student misconceptions in science concepts. Heliyon, 8, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10720
Steegen, A., Hasendonckx, F., & Cock, M. E. (2018). Can a interactive learning path on a tablet pc counter misconceptions on the formation of clouds and wind? Review of International Geographical Education Online, 8(1), 53-73.
Suprapto, N. (2020). Do we experience misconception?: an ontological review of misconceptions in science. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(2), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.46627/sipose.v1i2.24
Wartono, W., Saifullah, A. M., & Sugiyanto, S. (2016). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa kelas X pada materi fluida statis dengan instrumen diagnostik three-tier. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 23(1), 20-26.
Wibowo, F. C., Suhandi, A., Rusdiana, D., Ruhiat, Y., Darman, D. R., & Samsudin, A. (2017). Effectiveness of microscopic virtual simulation (MVS) for conceptualizing students’ conceptions on phase transitions. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 839-843. http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7542
Widodo, L., Yuliati, L., & Parno, P. (2018). Penguasaan konsep pada hukum archimedes siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(6), 745-750. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i6.11138
Yudhittiara, R. F., Hindarto, N., & Mosik, M. (2017). Identifikasi miskonsepsi menggunakan cri dan penyebabnya pada materi mekanika fluida kelas XI SMA. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 6(2), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v6i2.16076
Zulfadli, Z., & Munawwarah, I. (2016). Identifikasi pemahaman siswa terhadap konsep kelarutan dan hasil kali kelarutan dengan menggunakan three-tier multiple choice. Jurnal Edukasi Kimia, 1(1), 32-40.
Copyright (c) 2023 IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The copyright of the received article once accepted for publication shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles.


