Profile of Students' Misconceptions on Substance Pressure Using a Three-tier Diagnostic Test
Abstract
Research aims to find out misconceptions experienced by students on the subject matter of substance pressure. This type of research is quantitative descriptive research using a survey method. The instrumental test used was a three-tier diagnostic test to determine the under-examined misconceptions. The research sample consisted of 43 junior high school students who had previously received substance-pressure learning materials in class. The data were analyzed by categorizing them into understanding the concept, needing more knowledge, errors, and misconception. The results of the study were as follows: (1) 9% of the students understood the concept, 51% of the students had a misconception, 34% of the students were lack of knowledge, and 6% of the students had some errors (2) misconceptions with the highest percentage were in the sub-concept of pressure gases with an average percentage of 70%, then the pressure of liquids (capillarity and osmosis in plant stems) was 52%, the pressure of solids was 51%.
Abstract View: 482 
PDF Download: 357
Similarity Check Download: 58
Metrics
References
Ardiansyah, A., Dirgantara, Y., Agustina, R. D., & Sugilar, H. (2019). Penerapan model pembelajaran ECIRR (elicit, confront, identify, resolve, reinforce) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah peserta didik pada materi fluida statis. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 10(1), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.3.444-450
Campbell, N. A., & Reece, J. B. (2010). Biologi (8th ed.). Erlangga.
Giancoli, D. (2014). Fisika: Prinsip dan aplikasi (5th ed.). Erlangga.
Gurbuz, F. (2016). Physics education: Effect of micro-teaching method supported by educational technologies on pre-service science teachers’ misconceptions on basic astronomy subjects. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(2), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i2.1140
Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 989-1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a
Handayani, L., Nugroho, S. E., Rohidi, T. R., & Wiyanto, W. (2019). Analog-analog pilihan siswa untuk cahaya merambat lurus. Prosiding Seminar Nasional The 5th Lontar Physics Forum 2019, 1-9.
Idayanti, I., Darsono, T., & Naini, M., B. (2019). Pengembangan tes diagnostik menggunakan certainty of response index (CRI) termodifikasi pada materi tekanan zat untuk siswa kelas viii smp. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 8(1), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v8i1.29503
Kiray, S. A., & Simsek, S. (2021). Determination and evaluation of the science teacher candidates' misconceptions about density by using a four-tier diagnostic test. International Journal Science Mathematic Education, 19(5), 935-955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10087-5
Laksana, D. N. L. (2016). Miskonsepsi dalam materi IPA sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(2), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v5i2.8588
Laliyo, L. A. R. (2019). The development of two-tier instrument based on distractor to assess conceptual understanding level and student misconceptions in explaining redox reactions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(9), 216-237. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.9.12
Liampa, V., Malandrakis, G. N., Papadopoulou, P., & Pnevmatikos, P. (2019). Development and evaluation of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess undergraduate primary teachers’ understanding of ecological footprint. Research Science Education, 49(3), 711-736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9643-1
Malikha, Z., & Amir, M. F. (2018). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa kelas V-B min buduran sidoarjo pada materi pecahan ditinjau dari kemampuan matematika. Pi: Mathematics Education Journal, 1(2), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.21067/pmej.v1i2.2329
Mufidah, I., & Budiarto, M. T. (2018). Miskonsepsi siswa SMP dalam memahami konsep bangun datar segiempat ditinjau dari gaya belajar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(7), 232-239.
Mulyastuti, H., Setyarsih, W., & Mukhayyarotin, N. R. J. (2016). Profil reduksi miskonsepsi siswa materi dinamika rotasi sebagai pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran ecirr berbantuan media audiovisual. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika (JIPF), 5(2), 82-84. https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v5n2.p%25p
Munawaroh, F., & Falahi, M. D. (2016). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa sdn kemayoran 1 bangkalan pada konsep cahaya menggunakan CRI (certainty of response index). Jurnal Pena Sains, 3(1), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.21107/jps.v3i1.1770
Mustikasari, V. R., Annisa, M., & Munzil, M. (2017). Identifikasi miskonsepsi konsep tekanan zat kelas viii-c smpn 1 karangploso semester genap tahun pelajaran 2017-2018. Jurnal Pembelajaran Sains, 1(2), 39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um033v1i2p39-50
Nadelson, L. S., Heddy, B. C., Jones, S., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Johnson, M. (2018). Conceptual change in science teaching and learning: Introducing the dynamic model of conceptual change. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(2), 153-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2018.3249
Nurrohmah, E. S., Susilaningsih, E., & Nuswowati, M. (2018). Instrument design diagnostic test three-tier multiple choice redox material with redox diagnostic test software (RDT). Journal of Innovative Science Education, 7(2), 190-199. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v7i2.24147
Palisoa, N., Suyono., & Agustini, R. (2021). Strategi conceptual change terintegrasi recall memfasilitasi proses terjadinya konflik kognitif dan reduksi beban miskonsepsi mahasiswa calon guru kimia. MjoCE, 11(1), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.30598/MJoCEvol11iss1pp17-23
Prastiwi, A. C., Kholiq, A., & Setyarsih, W. (2017). Implementation of ECIRR model based on virtual simulation media to reduce students' misconception on kinetic theory of gases. Seminar Nasional Fisika (SNF) 2017, 1-10.
Prayitno, T. A., & Hidayati, N. (2022). Analysis of students’ misconception on general biology concepts using four-tier diagnostic test (FTDT). International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 3(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i1.177
Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Hertina, A. M. (2019). The misconception diagnosis on ionic and covalent bonds concepts with three tier diagnostic test. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1477-1488. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12194a
Putri, W. O., Maria, H. T., & Hamdani, H. (2021). Analisis miskonsepsi menggunakan four-tier diagnostic test berbantuan google form pada materi tekanan zat. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(6), 4738-4749. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i6.1445
Putro, T. I., Ariani, S. R. D., & Yamtinah, S. (2019). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa dengan two-tier diagnostic test dilengkapi certainty of response index (CRI) pada topik materi hidrolisis garam sebagian. Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia, 4(2), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v4i2.34325
Rukmana, D. (2017). Identifikasi miskonsepsi pada materi prinsip archimedes di smk dengan menggunakan tes diagnostik pilihan ganda tingkat tiga. Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v2i2.8276
Saputra, O., Setiawan, A., & Rusdiana, D. (2018). Identification of student misconception about static fluid. Hosted by International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE 2018), 1-10.
Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2009). Fisika untuk sains dan teknik (6th ed.). Salemba Teknika.
Setiawan, D., Cahyono, E., & Kurniawan, C. (2017). Identifikasi dan analisis miskonsepsi pada materi ikatan kimia menggunakan instrumen tes diagnostik three-tier. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 6(2), 197-204. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v6i2.15580
Shofiyah, N. (2017). Penerapan model pembelajaran modifed free inquiry untuk mereduksi miskonsepsi mahasiswa pada materi fluida. Science Education Journal, 1(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.21070/sej.v1i1.836
Soeharto, S., & Csapo, B. (2021). Evaluating item difficulty patterns for assessing student misconceptions in science across physics, chemistry, and biology concepts. Heliyon, 7, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08352
Soeharto, S., Csapo, B., Sarimanah, E., Dewi, F. I., & Sarbi, T. (2019). A review of students’ common misconceptions in science and their diagnostic assessment tools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 247-267. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.18649
Soeharto, S., & Csapo, B. (2022). Exploring indonesian student misconceptions in science concepts. Heliyon, 8, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10720
Steegen, A., Hasendonckx, F., & Cock, M. E. (2018). Can a interactive learning path on a tablet pc counter misconceptions on the formation of clouds and wind? Review of International Geographical Education Online, 8(1), 53-73.
Suprapto, N. (2020). Do we experience misconception?: an ontological review of misconceptions in science. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(2), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.46627/sipose.v1i2.24
Wartono, W., Saifullah, A. M., & Sugiyanto, S. (2016). Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa kelas X pada materi fluida statis dengan instrumen diagnostik three-tier. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 23(1), 20-26.
Wibowo, F. C., Suhandi, A., Rusdiana, D., Ruhiat, Y., Darman, D. R., & Samsudin, A. (2017). Effectiveness of microscopic virtual simulation (MVS) for conceptualizing students’ conceptions on phase transitions. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 839-843. http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7542
Widodo, L., Yuliati, L., & Parno, P. (2018). Penguasaan konsep pada hukum archimedes siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(6), 745-750. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i6.11138
Yudhittiara, R. F., Hindarto, N., & Mosik, M. (2017). Identifikasi miskonsepsi menggunakan cri dan penyebabnya pada materi mekanika fluida kelas XI SMA. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 6(2), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v6i2.16076
Zulfadli, Z., & Munawwarah, I. (2016). Identifikasi pemahaman siswa terhadap konsep kelarutan dan hasil kali kelarutan dengan menggunakan three-tier multiple choice. Jurnal Edukasi Kimia, 1(1), 32-40.
Copyright (c) 2023 IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 482 times
PDF downloaded = 357 times
Similarity Check downloaded = 58 times
