Digital Literacy Practice: Pedagogical Approach with CoPORA Model on Students’ Performances in Writing Classroom
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to describe the impact of the CoPORA model on EFL university students’ performances in accessing, communicating, integrating, evaluating, and creating information using social media in a writing classroom. Method: Data were collected using interview techniques from EFL university students and analyzed descriptively to achieve the study's objectives. Results: The CoPORA model in pedagogical digital literacy practices enables students to master English vocabulary, be motivated to communicate, develop social identity, and manage and evaluate information effectively. Key performances included creating and communicating argumentative texts with readers on social media platforms. Social media usage facilitated checking trusted sources and contents, communicating information with friends, lecturers, and followers, making cross-references among digital content and facts, proving the truth of contents, and writing and communicating argumentative texts. Novelty: The study found that pedagogical digital literacy practices using the CoPORA model positively contribute to students' mutual contributions to language learning, cognition, and social interaction in English essay-writing classrooms.
Abstract View: 236 
PDF Download: 167
Similarity Check Download: 22
Metrics
References
Abella, J. L., & Rosa, E. D. (2023). Digital literacy and digital competence of selected filipino teachers: basis for a post-pandemic pedagogy. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(5), 548-569. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i5.378
Ahmed, M. M. H., McGahan, P. S., Indurkhya, B., Kaneko, K., & Nakagawa, M. (2021). Effects of synchronized and asynchronized e-feedback interactions on academic writing, achievement motivation and critical thinking. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 13(3), 290–315. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.016
Akayoğlu, S., Satar, H. M., Dikilitaş, K., Cirit, N. C., & Korkmazgil, S. (2020). Digital literacy practices of Turkish pre-service EFL teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4711
Akpur, U. (2020). Critical, reflective, creative thinking and their reflections on academic achievement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100683
Arif, T. (2019). The use of social media for english language learning: an exploratory study of EFL university students. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 3(2), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v3i2.1921
Atmowardoyo, H. (2018). Research methods in TEFL studies: Descriptive research, case study, error analysis, and R&D. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(1), 197. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0901.25
Bourdeaud’hui, H., Aesaert, K., & van Braak, J. (2021). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness, motivation, and L1 students’ critical listening skills. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1872474
Cáceres, M., Nussbaum, M., & Ortiz, J. (2020). Integrating critical thinking into the classroom: A teacher’s perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100674
Cutrim Schmid, E. (2022). ‘I think it’s boring if you now only speak English’: enhancing learner investment in EFL learning through the use of plurilingual tasks. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1868476
Erarslan, A. (2019). Instagram as an education platform for EFL learners. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, 18(3), 54–69.
Farahian, M., Avarzamani, F., & Rajabi, Y. (2021). Reflective thinking in an EFL Writing course: To what level do portfolios improve reflection in writing? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100759
Haerazi, H., Utama, I. M. P., & Hidayatullah, H. (2020). Mobile applications to improve english writing skills viewed from critical thinking ability for pre-service teachers. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 14(7), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i07.11900
Hamilton, S. (2019). Reflection(s) in/on digital writing’s hybrid pedagogy, 2010–2017. Computers and Composition, 52, 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.02.006
Hamman-Ortiz, L., Santiago Schwarz, V., Hamm-Rodríguez, M., & Gort, M. (2023). Engaging teachers in genre-based pedagogy for writing arguments: a case study of shifts in practice and understanding. TESOL Quarterly, 57(2), 402–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3156
Iskandar, I., Sumarni, S., Dewanti, R., & Asnur, M. N. A. (2022). Infusing digital literacy in authentic academic digital practices of english language teaching at universities. International Journal of Language Education, 6(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i1.31574
Kacetl, J., & Klímová, B. (2019). Use of smartphone applications in english language learning—A challenge for foreign language education. Education Sciences, 9(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030179
Kleemola, K., Hyytinen, H., & Toom, A. (2022). The challenge of position-taking in novice higher education students’ argumentative writing. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.885987
Knight, J., Dooly, M., & Barberà, E. (2023). Getting smart: Towards critical digital literacy pedagogies. Social Semiotics, 33(2), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1836815
Kumpulainen, K., Sairanen, H., & Nordström, A. (2020). Young children’s digital literacy practices in the sociocultural contexts of their homes. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 20(3), 472-499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798420925116
Lawrence, A. M., & Sherry, M. B. (2021). How feedback from an online video game teaches argument writing for environmental action. Journal of Literacy Research, 53(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X20986598
Li, D. (2022). A review of academic literacy research development: From 2002 to 2019. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(5), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00130-z
Kumpulainen, K., Sairanen, H., & Nordström, A. (2020). Young children’s digital literacy practices in the sociocultural contexts of their homes. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 20(3), 472-499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798420925116
Mirzaei, A., Shafiee Rad, H., & Rahimi, E. (2024). Integrating ARCS motivational model and flipped teaching in L2 classrooms: a case of EFL expository writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(5–6), 1136–1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2068614
Moon, S. J., & Bai, S. Y. (2020). Components of digital literacy as predictors of youth civic engagement and the role of social media news attention: The case of Korea. Journal of Children and Media, 14(4), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1728700
Ong, W. A., Swanto, S., Alsaqqaf, A., & Ong, J. W. (2021). Promoting reflective practice via the use of 5-step copora reflective model: A case study of east malaysian esl pre-service teachers. Teflin Journal, 32(1), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v32i1/72-96
Rao, P. (2019). The impact of social media on learning english: a critical study in english language teaching (ELT) context. Research Journal of English (RJOE), 845, 266–274.
Ribas, F. C. (2021). Rethinking digital literacy practices and educational agendas in times of COVID-19 uncertainty. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 22(2), 399–431. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6398202117285
Sattam, P. (2021). The relationship between language proficiency level and L2 digital literacy self-efficacy: A study of EFL university students. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies (IJAES), 21(2), 1-11.
Schmidt, T. (2018). How we talk about the work is the work. Performance Research, 23(2), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2018.1464751
Sheffler, P., Rodriguez, T. M., Cheung, C. S., & Wu, R. (2022). Cognitive and metacognitive, motivational, and resource considerations for learning new skills across the lifespan. WIREs Cognitive Science, 13(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1585
Taheri, P., & Nazmi, R. (2021). Improving EFL learners’ argumentative writing ability: Teacher vs. peer scaffolding. Teaching English Language, 15(2), 299–333. https://doi.org/10.22132/TEL.2021.143348
Tham, J. C. K., Burnham, K. D., Hocutt, D. L., Ranade, N., Misak, J., Duin, A. H., Pedersen, I., & Campbell, J. L. (2021). Metaphors, mental models, and multiplicity: Understanding student perception of digital literacy. Computers and Composition, 59, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102628
Valentová, M., & Brečka, P. (2019). Implementation of the critical thinking strategies in the school subject technology: A preliminary study. TEM Journal, 8(3), 998–1004. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM83-43
VanDerHeide, J., Newell, G. E., & Olsen, A. W. (2023). Conceptualizing dialogic literary argumentation: Inviting students to take a turn in important conversations. Written Communication, 40(2), 417–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883221148680
Wu, Z. (2020). Tracing EFL writers’ digital literacy practices in asynchronous communication: A multiple-case study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100754
Zhang, M., Akoto, M., & Li, M. (2021). Digital multimodal composing in post-secondary L2 settings: a review of the empirical landscape. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 694-721. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1942068
Copyright (c) 2024 IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 236 times
PDF downloaded = 167 times
Similarity Check downloaded = 22 times
