Validity And Practicality of The Scientific Creativity Project-Based Learning (SCPjBL) Model to Increase The Scientific Creativity of Physics Education Undergraduate Students
Abstract
Objective: Describe the validity and practicality of the SCPjBL model in terms of development needs, up-to-date knowledge, and implementation of learning and student activities. Method: The method in this study is a development method that has been modified and applied in universities in 2024. The sample in this study was 180 people from two different universities. Data were collected based on the validation results and observation of the implementation of the SCPjBL model. The assessment instrument uses a validation sheet that is assessed by three validators who are experts in their respective fields. The instruments used for the implementation of the model are the lesson plan and student worksheet implementation observation sheet. The observation sheet was filled in by four observers who were divided into two observers who were tasked with observing the implementation of the SCPjBL model phase and two others who observed student activities. Results: The results of the observations were then analyzed quantitatively. A study in the form of validation results from three validators obtained an average score of 3.92 with an average validity percentage of 98% with a very valid category. The results of the practicality of the SCPjBL model and its supporting devices obtained a score of 3.56, with an average percentage of implementation reaching 91%. Novelty: This research emphasizes solving physics problems by taking two approaches simultaneously. It is done by exploring students' initial knowledge as an initial check for solving complex problems presented to students in the form of scientific phenomena
Abstract View: 98 
PDF Download: 119
Similarity Check Download: 8
Metrics
References
Andres, E. C. A., & Rosalinda, B. (2023). Online flipped learning model in a college physical education course. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.1.413
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed.). McGraw Hill.
Ariandani, N., Ermanda, S., & Fajri, N. (2020). The effect of project-based learning model using three-dimensional media and computation on achievement of study reviewed based on student’s creativity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1539(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1539/1/012056
Astutik, S., & Prahani, B. K. (2018). The practicality and effectiveness of collaborative creativity learning (CCL) model by using PhET simulation to increase students’ scientific creativity. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11426a
Buck-Pavlick, H. (2022). Empowering metacognition through dance writing and collaborative dance making. Journal of Dance Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15290824.2022.2051041
Cheli, S., Chiarello, F., & Cavalletti, V. (2023). A psychotherapy oriented by compassion and metacognition for schizoid personality disorder: A two-case series. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-022-09566-3
Chin, M. K., & Siew, N. M. (2015). The development and validation of a figural scientific creativity test for preschool pupils. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(6), 1391–1402. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.612139
Cirkony, C. (2023). Flexible, creative, constructive, and collaborative: The makings of an authentic science inquiry task. International Journal of Science Education, 45(17), 1440–1462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2213384
Dwikoranto, D., Jatmiko, B., Hariyono, E., Lestari, N. A., Prahani, B. K., & Suyidno. (2021). MobLen model for enhancing scientific creativity of physics students: An alternative in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1805(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1805/1/012006
Faize, F. A. (2020). Addressing environmental knowledge and environmental attitude in undergraduate students through scientific argumentation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119928
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw Hill.
Guasch, B., González, M., & Cortiñas, S. (2020). Educational toolkit based on design methodologies to promote scientific knowledge transfer in secondary schools: A graphene-centered case study. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.787
Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: A systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00169-2
Irma, Z. U., Kusairi, S., & Yuliati, L. (2023). STREAM PBL with e-authentic assessment: Its impact on students’ scientific creativity on static fluid. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.40214
Ismail, R. N., Arnawa, I. M., & Yerizon, Y. (2020). Student worksheet usage effectiveness based on realistic mathematics education towards mathematical communication ability of junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1554(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1554/1/012044
Jedaman, P. (2021). Analyzed and causal factor the 21st-century leadership 4.0 of science educational for sustainable. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1835(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012097
Nilada, N., Payougkiattikun, W., & Thongsuk, T. (2024). The study of scientific creativity using a project-based learning management model. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 6(2), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.667
PISA. (2023). PISA 2022 results factsheets Indonesia. The Language of Science Education, 1(1), 1–9. https://oecdch.art/a40de1dbaf/C108
Prahani, B. K., Suprapto, N., Rachmadiarti, F., Sholahuddin, A., Mahtari, S., Suyidno, & Siswanto, J. (2021). Online scientific creativity learning (OSCL) in science education to improve students’ scientific creativity in COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18, 77–90. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.73
Rosidin, U., Kadaritna, N., & Hasnunidah, N. (2019). Can argument-driven inquiry models have impact on critical thinking skills for students with different personality types? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(3), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.24725
Saepudin, A. (2020). Project-based learning implementation to student’s scientific attitude and creativity improvement. Jurnal Mangifera Edu, 5(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.31943/mangiferaedu.v5i1.89
Santyasa, W. I., Rapi, K. N., & Sara, W. I. (2020). The effect of problem-based flipped learning and academic procrastination on students’ critical thinking in learning physics in high school. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 489–508. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210715.094
Şenel, E. (2018). The integration of creative writing into academic writing skills in EFL classes. International Journal of Languages’ Education, 6(2), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.2869
Siagian, A. F., Ibrahim, M., & Supardi, Z. A. I. (2023). Creative-scientific decision-making skills learning model for training creative thinking skills and student decision-making skills. Nurture, 17(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.55951/nurture.v17i1.141
Sidek, R., Halim, L., Buang, N. A., & Mohamad, N. (2020). Fostering scientific creativity in teaching and learning science in schools: A systematic review. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 6(1), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v6i1.7149
Stamer, I., David, M. A., Höffler, T., Schwarzer, S., & Parchmann, I. (2021). Authentic insights into science: Scientific videos used in out-of-school learning environments. International Journal of Science Education, 43(6), 868–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1891321
Sujarwanto, E., Madlazim, M., & Ibrahim, M. (2022). Literasi data dalam pembelajaran fisika dan penilaian. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 421-430. https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v6i2.5442
Sukma, A. I., Muhyi, M., & Ketut, I. (2023). Hakikat ilmu dan pengetahuan dalam kajian filsafat ilmu. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(17), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8310477
Sumarni, W., & Kadarwati, S. (2020). Ethno-STEM project-based learning: Its impact on critical and creative thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.21754
Sumo, M., Jatmiko, B., Supardi, Z. A. I., & Suprianto, S. (2024). The influence of the project-based learning model on the scientific creativity of physics education undergraduate students at Madura Islamic University. SEJ (Science Education Journal, 8(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.21070/sej.v8i2.1651
Suradika, D. N. (2023). Enhancing students' critical and creative thinking skills in science education. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.39713
Suyidno, N., Yuanita, L., & Prahani, B. K. (2018). Effectiveness of creative responsibility-based teaching (CRBT) model on basic physics learning to increase student’s scientific creativity and responsibility. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(1), 136–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.136
Taibu, R., Mataka, L., & Shekoyan, V. (2021). Using PhET simulations to improve scientific skills and attitudes of community college students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(3), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.46328/IJEMST.1214
Wibowo, F. C. (2023a). Effects of augmented reality integration (ARI)-based model physics independent learning (MPIL) for facilitating 21st-century skills (21-CS). Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1800
Wibowo, F. C. (2023b). Effects of augmented reality integration (ARI) based model physics independent learning (MPIL) for facilitating 21st-century skills (21-CS). Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1800
Wicaksono, I. (2020). Validity and practicality of the biotechnology series learning model to concept mastery and scientific creativity. Journal of Education Research, 13(3), 157–170.
Yamin, Y., Permanasari, A., Redjeki, S., & Sopandi, W. (2020). Project-based learning to enhance creative thinking skills of non-science students. JHSS (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 4(2), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v4i2.2450
Zainuddin, Z., Suyidno, S., Dewantara, D., Mahtari, S., Nur, M., Yuanita, L., & T. S. (2020). The correlation of scientific knowledge, science process skills, and scientific creativity in creative responsibility-based learning. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 307–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13321a
Copyright (c) 2024 IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 98 times
PDF downloaded = 119 times
Similarity Check downloaded = 8 times
