The The Influence of Computational Thinking Skills, Critical Thinking Skills, and Collaborative Thinking Skills on the Learning Outcomes of Robotics Competence of Electrical Engineering Education Students

Fendi Achmad; Agus Wiyono; M. Syariffuddien Z; Nur Kholis; Ali Nur Fathoni; Inaya Retno Putri; Daeng Rahmatullah; Yuli Sutoto Nugroho

doi:10.46245/ijorer.v6i1.732

Fendi Achmad Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Agus Wiyono Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
M. Syariffuddien Z Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Nur Kholis Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Ali Nur Fathoni Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Inaya Retno Putri Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Daeng Rahmatullah Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Yuli Sutoto Nugroho Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v6i1.732

Keywords: Collaborative thinking, Computational thinking, Critical thinking, Learning Outcame, Robotics

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to examine the influence of computational thinking skills, critical thinking skills, and collaborative thinking skills on the learning outcomes of robotics competencies of Electrical Engineering Education Students. Method: The sample in this study was 150 respondents, all of whom were students of the Electrical Engineering Education Study Program at Universitas Negeri Surabaya. The research data were obtained from filling out the questionnaire and analyzed quantitatively using the SEM PLS analysis technique with the help of the SmartPLS program. Results: This study shows that (1) Critical thinking skills have a positive effect on the educational robotics-based learning system, (2) computational thinking skills have a positive effect on the educational robotics-based learning system, (3) collaborative skills have a positive effect on the educational robotics-based learning system, (4) critical thinking skills have a positive effect on learning outcomes, (5) Computational Thinking Skills have a positive effect on learning outcomes, (6) Collaboration Skills have a positive effect on learning outcomes, (7) educational robotics-based learning systems have a positive effect on learning outcomes. Novelty: Educational robotics-based learning systems can be an ideal platform for developing computational, critical, and collaborative thinking skills among students. The use of robots as interactive and direct learning media through experiments and problem solving. This can help better understand technical concepts and increase confidence in facing complex challenges in the increasingly connected and rapidly changing real world.

Abstract View: 224

PDF Download: 140

Similarity Check Download: 19

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Akaike, M., Fukutomi, M., Nagamune, M., Fujimoto, A., Tsuji, A., Ishida, K., & Iwata, T. (2012). Simulation-based medical education in clinical skills laboratory. Journal of Medical Investigation, 59(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.2152/jmi.59.28

Al-Abbas, M., Fawaz, W., Ghajar, R., Rjeily, C. A., Ouaiss, I., Nakad, Z., Nasr, G. E., & Saab, S. S. (2020). Toward an improvement of engineering teaming skills through an in-house professionalism course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 63(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2020.2980379

Alam, M. N. H. Z., & Zakaria, Z. Y. (2021). Application of computational tools to support cooperative learning in bioreactor design course. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(15), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i15.23697

Álvarez-Herrero, J. F. (2020). Computational thinking in early childhood education, beyond floor robots. Education in the Knowledge Society, 21, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.22366

Anasrul, A., & Sirozi, M. (2024). The urgency of collaborative attitude in educational leadership. INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 11(2), 679–685. https://doi.org/10.36232/interactionjournal.v11i2.544

Atun, H., & Usta, E. (2019). The effects of programming education planned with TPACK framework on learning outcomes. Participatory Educational Research, 6(2), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.19.10.6.2

Azadi, S., Green, I. C., Arnold, A., Truong, M., Potts, J., & Martino, M. A. (2021). Robotic surgery: The impact of simulation and other innovative platforms on performance and training. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 28(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.001

Bano, S., Atif, K., & Mehdi, S. A. (2024). Systematic review: Potential effectiveness of educational robotics for 21st century skills development in young learners. Education and Information Technologies, 29(9), 11135–11153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12233-2

Barcelos, T. S., Munoz, R., Villarroel, R., Merino, E., & Silveira, I. F. (2018). Mathematics learning through computational thinking activities: A systematic literature review. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 24(7), 22-31.

Begum, F. A., Kayani, B., Morgan, S. D. J., Ahmed, S. S., Singh, S., & Haddad, F. S. (2020). Robotic technology: Current concepts, operative techniques and emerging uses in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Reviews, 5(5), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190089

Bonnano, K. (2021). Knowledge building through multiple literacy learning. IASL Annual Conference Proceedings, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.29173/iasl8082

Bridges, D. R., Davidson, R. A., Odegard, P. S., Maki, I. V., & Tomkowiak, J. (2011). Interprofessional collaboration: Three best practice models of interprofessional education. Medical Education Online, 16(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v16i0.6035

Budiyanto, C. W., Fenyvesi, K., Lathifah, A., & Yuana, R. A. (2022). Computational thinking development: Benefiting from educational robotics in STEM teaching. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.1997

Ccopa Ybarra, L. A., & Soares, M. (2022). Robotics and computational thinking in education: A proposal for project-based learning assessment. DIALOGIA, 40. Education, 6(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0160-9

Chaidi, E., Kefalis, C., Papagerasimou, Y., & Drigas, A. (2021). Educational robotics in primary education: A case in Greece. Research, Society and Development, 10(9), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i9.16371

Ching, Y.-H., & Hsu, Y.-C. (2024). Educational robotics for developing computational thinking in young learners: A systematic review. TechTrends, 68(3), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00841-1

Chiu, T. K. F., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2022). Teacher support and student motivation to learn with artificial intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2172044

Conde, M. Á., Rodríguez-Sedano, F. J., Fernández-Llamas, C., Gonçalves, J., Lima, J., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2021). Fostering STEAM through challenge-based learning, robotics, and physical devices: A systematic mapping literature review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22354

Ismail, *Ismail, Putri, R. S., Zulfadhli, Z., Mustofa, A., Musfiana, M., & Hadiyani, R. (2022). Student motivation to follow the student creativity program. Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities, 5(2), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v5i2.27641

Jamaluddin, J., Jufri, A. W., & Ramdani, A. (2024). Development of information processing learning design to empower communication and collaboration skills of prospective biology teacher students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(8), 6267–6276. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i8.8292

Papadakis, S. (2022). In-service teachers’ beliefs about educational robotics in preschool classrooms. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2022.121770

Safaruddin, S., Degeng, I., Setyosari, P., & Murtadho, N. (2020). The Effect of PjBL with WBL Media and Cognitive Style on Students Understanding and Science-Integrated Concept Application. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 384-395. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24628

Schina, D., Esteve-González, V., & Usart, M. (2021). An overview of teacher training programs in educational robotics: Characteristics, best practices, and recommendations. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2831–2852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10377-z

Tang, A. L. L., Tung, V. W. S., & Cheng, T. O. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions of the potential use of educational robotics in management education. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1780269

Tengler, K., Kastner-Hauler, O., Sabitzer, B., & Lavicza, Z. (2022). The effect of robotics-based storytelling activities on primary school students’ computational thinking. Education Sciences, 12(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010010

Uslu, N. A., Yavuz, G. Ö., & Koçak Usluel, Y. (2023). A systematic review study on educational robotics and robots. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5874–5898. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2023890

Vogt, A., Babel, F., Hock, P., Baumann, M., & Seufert, T. (2021). Prompting in-depth learning in immersive virtual reality: Impact of an elaboration prompt on developing a mental model. Computers and Education, 171, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104235

Wang, L., Yu, Y., Wang, J., Li, S., & Jiang, T. (2022). Evaluation of the learning curve for robotic single-anastomosis duodenal–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Frontiers in Surgery, 9, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.969418

Wang, Y. (2023). The role of computer-supported project-based learning in students’ computational thinking and engagement in robotics courses. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 48, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101269

Wolters, C. A., & Brady, A. C. (2021). College students’ time management: A self-regulated learning perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1319–1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09519-z

Wong, S. W., & Crowe, P. (2022). Factors affecting the learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 16(6), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01373-1

Yang, K., Liu, X., & Chen, G. (2020). The influence of robots on students' computational thinking: A literature review. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(8), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.8.1435

Yang, W., Luo, H., & Su, J. (2022). Towards inclusiveness and sustainability of robot programming in early childhood: Child engagement, learning outcomes, and teacher perception. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1486–1510. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13266

Yang, X., Ji, Z., Wu, J., Lai, Y. K., Wei, C., Liu, G., & Setchi, R. (2022). Hierarchical reinforcement learning with universal policies for multistep robotic manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33(9), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3059912

Zhang, J. H., Meng, B., Zou, L. C., Zhu, Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2021). Progressive flowchart development scaffolding to improve university students’ computational thinking and programming self-efficacy. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1943687

Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2020). Learning to read and dyslexia: From theory to intervention through personalized computational models. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420915873