Scaffolding Based On Scientific Creativity Learning (SSCL): An Innovative Learning Model To Improve Student’s Skill in Scientific Creativity
Abstract
Objective: Describe The development of the SSCL model, including validity, practicality, effectivity, and student response with the implementation of learning and student activities. This study aimed to obtain validity, practicality, effectivity, and student responses to the SSCL model in Junior high school. Method: This type of research is Research and Development (R&D) research oriented towards product development using the ADDIE development model—determination of the research location using a purposive sampling area. The sample in this study was student class VIII. Results: The results showed (1) the validity and reliability are very valid and very reliable, (2) an improved indicator of achievement with high category, (2) most of the students gave responses that scaffolding based on Scientific Creativity Learning (SSCL) models enabled them to practice scientific creativity skills in junior high school. Novelty: This research emphasizes using scaffolding for Proximal Zone Development (ZPD) approach students and students' initial conceptions of learning science. The result findings show that each phase of SSCL significantly contributes to increasing the achievement of indicators of scientific creativity.
Abstract View: 139 
PDF Download: 123
Similarity Check Download: 6
Metrics
References
Abidin, Z., & Sulaiman, F. (2024). The effectiveness of problem-based learning on students' ability to think critically. Zabags International Journal of Education, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.61233/zijed.v2i1.13
Adhelacahya, K., Sukarmin, S., & Sarwanto, S. (2023). The impact of problem-based learning electronics module integrated with STEM on students' critical thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(7), 4869–4878. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.3931
Algiani, S. R., Artayasa, I. P., Sukarso, A. A., & Ramdani, A. (2023). Application of guided inquiry model using self-regulated learning approach to improve students' creative disposition and creative thinking skills in biology subject. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2836
Anh, T. T. N., Nguyen, N. T., & Nguyen, A. T. T. (2023). The impact of online self-assessment on learning outcomes and self-assessment skills among grade 11 students in Vietnam. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(4), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.4.2
Arends, R. (2012). Learning to teach. McGraw-Hill.
Astutik, S., & Prahani, B. K. (2018). The practicality and effectiveness of collaborative creativity learning (CCL) model by using PhET simulation to increase students’ scientific creativity. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11426a
Astutik, S., Banowati, E., Apriyanto, B., & Mujib, M. A. (2024). Influence of creative outdoor learning (COL) model for improving high school students' critical thinking skills. Jurnal Majalah Pembelajaran Geografi, 7(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.19184/pgeo.v7i2.50748
Astutik, S., Nur, M., & Susantini, E. (2016). Validity of collaborative creativity (CC) models. International Conference on Research Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Science, 73–78.
Astutik, S., Susantini, E., Madlazim, M., & Supeno, S. (2020). The effectiveness of collaborative creativity learning models (CCL) on secondary schools' scientific creativity skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 525-538. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13336a
Bazarbayeva, S., & Aitbayeva, N. (2023). Improving critical thinking skills of master students through problem-based learning model. Вестник КазНУ. Серия педагогическая, 74(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.26577/JES.2023.v74.i1.02
Beetlestone, F. (2012). Creative learning: Imaginative teaching. Open University Press.
Dewi, V. C., Kuswanti, N., & Prijono, B. (2023). Implementation of problem-based learning model based on differentiated learning to improve science literacy skills and student activities. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 7(2), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2836
Dilekçi, A., & Karatay, H. (2023). The effects of the 21st-century skills curriculum on the development of students’ creative thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101229
Hake, R. R. (1999). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-77.
Ifenthaler, D., Schumacher, C., & Kuzilek, J. (2023). Investigating students' use of self‐assessments in higher education using learning analytics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(1), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12744
Irma, Z. U., Kusairi, S., & Yuliati, L. (2023). STREAM PBL with e-authentic assessment: Its impact on students’ scientific creativity on static fluid. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.40214
Irwan, I., Arnadi, A., & Aslan, A. (2024). Developing critical thinking skills of primary school students through independent curriculum learning. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE, 4(3), 788–803.
Kumar, T., Soozandehfar, S. M. A., & Hashemifardnia, A. (2023). Self vs. peer assessment activities in EFL-speaking classes: Impacts on students’ self-regulated learning, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. Language Testing in Asia, 13(36), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00251-3
Mahmudah, R. Z., & Nugraha, M. S. (2024). Implementation of the problem-based learning model to improve critical thinking skills of Madrasah Aliyah santri students. Jurnal PAI Raden Fatah, 6(1), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.19109/pairf.v6i1
Moreno, R. (2010). Educational psychology. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Nisa', K., Suprapto, N., Shofiyah, N., & Cheng, T.-H. (2024). How does ethnoscience-students' worksheet (ESW) influence science learning? Journal of Education and Learning, 18(2), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21178
Nurhayati, I., Pramono, K. S. E., & Farida, A. (2024). Keterampilan 4C (critical thinking, creativity, communication, and collaboration) dalam pembelajaran IPS untuk menjawab tantangan abad 21. Jurnal Basicedu, 8(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v8i1.6842
OECD. (2013). Women and financial literacy. OECD.
Panadero, E., Fernández, J., Pinedo, L., Sánchez, I., & García-Pérez, D. (2024). A self-feedback model (SEFEMO): Secondary and higher education students’ self-assessment profiles. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 31(3–4), 221–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2024.2367027
Prahani, B. K., Rizki, I. A., Nisa', K., Citra, N. F., Alhusni, H. Z., & Wibowo, F. C. (2022). Implementation of online problem-based learning assisted by digital book with 3D animations to improve students' physics problem-solving skills in magnetic field subject. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(2), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1590
Saphira, H. V., & Prahani, B. K. (2022). Profile of senior high school students’ critical thinking skills and the need of implementation PBL model assisted by augmented reality book. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(3), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i3.25031
Sari, I. P., Rohmani, & Nisa', K. (2024). Analysis of the effectiveness of using flipbook-based e-modules in science learning in elementary schools. International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 5(6), 1367–1382. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v5i6.615
Schlimbach, R., Windolf, C., & Robra-Bissantz, S. (2023). A service perspective on designing learning companions as bonding and mindful time managers in further education. Thirty-first European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2023), 1-7.
Shofiyah, N., Suprapto, N., Prahani, B. K., Jatmiko, B., Anggraeni, D. M., & Nisa’, K. (2024). Exploring undergraduate students’ scientific reasoning in the force and motion concept. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2365579
Siagian, A. F., Ibrahim, M., & Supardi, Z. A. I. (2023). Creative-scientific decision-making skills learning model for training creative thinking skills and student decision-making skills. Nurture, 17(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.55951/nurture.v17i1.141
Supeno, S., Astutik, S., Bektiarso, A. D., Lesmono, & L. Nuraini. (2019). What can students show about higher-order thinking skills in physics learning? IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/17551315/243/1/012127
Tari, N., & Safitri, N. P. D. (2023). The effect of self-assessment towards students' writing competency. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Hotel, 7(1), 475–499. http://dx.doi.org/10.37484/jmph.070125
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., ... & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st-century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
Toader, C. S., Brad, I., Rujescu, C. I., Dumitrescu, C. S., Sîrbulescu, E. C., Orboi, M. D., ... & Gavrilă, C. (2023). Exploring students’ opinion towards integration of learning games in higher education subjects and improved soft skills—A comparative study in Poland and Romania. Sustainability, 15(10), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107969
Xu, E., Wang, W., & Wang, Q. (2023). The effectiveness of collaborative problem-solving in promoting students' critical thinking: A meta-analysis based on empirical literature. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1
Copyright (c) 2025 IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 139 times
PDF downloaded = 123 times
Similarity Check downloaded = 6 times
