Integrated Science Learning Webbed Type in Permaculture Theme and BRADeR Model to Enhance Science Literacy Competence of Junior High School Students
Abstract
Objective: This research aims to assess the scientific literacy of State Junior High School 1 Ngoro students in integrated science learning using the webbed type with a permaculture theme and the BRADeR model. Method: This descriptive quantitative study involves 80 students from State Junior High School 1 Ngoro: 16 from class IX-A (limited trial) and 64 from IX-B and IX-C (broader trial). Data collection was conducted using a science literacy competence test instrument consisting of 10 essay questions designed according to three dimensions of scientific literacy proficiency. The validity assessment by three experts showed that 9 out of 10 questions scored an average of 4, categorizing them as "very valid," while 1 question was also deemed "very valid." The reliability assessment using Cronbach's Alpha indicates good dependability. Data analysis utilized inferential statistics to assess the viability of webbed-type integrated science learning on permaculture and the BRADeR model in improving students' science literacy. Results: Findings indicate a notable enhancement in science literacy, presenting a mean n-gain of 0.73, which is categorized as high. The most significant enhancement was in articulating scientific phenomena, next was experimental design and data analysis. A moderate enhancement was observed in investigating, applying, and evaluating scientific knowledge for decision-making. Novelty: This research examines improvements in science literacy and emphasizes the need for multimedia and multimodel approaches through integrated science learning using the webbed type and BRADeR model.



References
Amrain, I., Panigoro, M., Ardiansyah, Bumulo, F., & Bahsoan, A. (2024). Pengaruh penerapan metode diskusi terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Damhil Education Journal, 4(1), 77–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.37905/dej.v4i1.2489
Arends, R.I. (2012). Learning to Teach. McGraw-Hill Companies.
Assem, H. D., Nartey, L., Appiah, E., & Aidoo, J. K. (2023). A review of students’ academic performance in physics: attitude, instructional methods, misconceptions and teachers qualification. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(1), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.1.551
Cao, C., Zhang, T., & Xin, T. (2024). The effect of reading engagement on scientific literacy – an analysis based on the XGBoost method. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1329724
Christidamayani, A. P., & Kristanto, Y. D. (2020). The effects of problem posing learning model on students’ learning achievement and motivation. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 2(2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v2i2.9981
Duke, N. K., Ward, A. E., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1993
Fatmawati, T. (2024). Pengaruh model pembelajaran inquiry learning berbantuan phet simulation terhadap literasi sains peserta didik. Omega: Jurnal pendidikan dan sains Fisika, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.47650/omega.v3i1.1206
Fuadi, H., Robbia, A. Z., Jamaluddin, J., & Jufri, A. W. (2020). Analisis faktor penyebab rendahnya kemampuan literasi sains peserta didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(2), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v5i2.122
Hake, R. (1999). American educational reseach association’s division d, measeruement and reaeach metodology: Analyzing change/gains scores. Wooland Hills
Jones, B. L. (2025). Science teachers’ conceptions of science: An analysis at the intersection of nature of science and culturally relevant science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 62(2), 525–552. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21984
Juniawan, E. R., Vira, H. S., Prasetya, A. T., & Rengga, W. D. P. (2023). Studi literatur: Analisis media pembelajaran IPA untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa sekolah dasar. CJPE: Cokroaminoto Juornal of Primary Education, 6(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.30605/cjpe.622023.2608
Khan, N., Sarwar, A., Chen, T. B., & Khan, S. (2022). Connecting digital literacy in higher education to the 21st century workforce. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 14(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2022.14.004
Komarudin, K., Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2024). The RMS teaching model with brainstorming technique and student digital literacy as predictors of mathematical literacy. Heliyon, 10(13), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33877
Kumar, M. (2023). Making decisions under uncertainty: The Prudent Judgement Approach. European Journal of International Security, 8(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2022.17
Li, B., Sjöström, J., Ding, B., & Eilks, I. (2023). Education for sustainability meets confucianism in science education. Science & Education, 32(4), 879–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00349-9
Luzyawati, L., Hamidah, I., Fauzan, A., & Husamah, H. (2025). Higher-order thinking skills-based science literacy questions for high school students. Journal of Education and Learning, 19(1), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21508
Hakim, M. N., Bakri, M., & Harsia, H. (2022). Pengaruh media youtube, motivasi, dan literasi membaca terhadap kemampuan menulis ilmiah. Bahtera Indonesia; Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(2), 328–337. https://doi.org/10.31943/bi.v7i2.220
Nurfadhilah, A., Haris, A., & Nursimin, N. (2023). Penerapan pendekatan saintifik dalam pembelajaran fisika sebagai upaya meningkatkan literasi sains di SMA negeri 5 makassar. Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 648–655. https://doi.org/10.31970/pendidikan.v5i2.704
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 result (volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Oktavia, Y. H. (2021). Implementasi pembelajaran terpadu dalam peningkatan kualitas pendidikan: Tinjauan literatur sistematis. JKPD) Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dasar, 6(2), 154–158. https://doi.org/10.26618/jkpd.v6i2.5573
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/11168-000
Putri, G. A., Rubini, B., & Suhardi, E. (2020). The enhancement of teacher creativity through school climate, servant leadership and scientific literacy. JHSS (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies), 7(3), 647–652. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v7i3.8006
Radus, M. (2023). Improving science literacy using photographic documentation of laboratory activities. Thesis. Hamline University.
Ramdani, A., Jufri, A. W., & Jamaluddin, J. (2020). Pengembangan media pembelajaran berbasis android pada masa pandemi COVID-19 untuk meningkatkan literasi sains peserta didik. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 6(3), 433-455. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v6i3.2924
Rosyidah, A., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., Tarbiyah, F., Keguruan, D., Darussalam, I., & Banyuwangi, B. (2023). Pengaruh model pembelajaran argumen-driven inquiry (ADI) terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa. Journal of Educational and Applied Science, 1(1), 14-19. https://doi.org/10.30739/jeas.v1i1.2514
Saphira, H. V., & Prahani, B. K. (2022). Profile of senior high school students’ critical thinking skills and the need of implementation PBL model assisted by augmented reality book. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(3), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i3.25031
Saphira, H. V., Rizki, I. A., Alfarizy, Y., Saputri, A. D., Ramadani, R., & Suprapto, N. (2022). Profile of students ’ critical thinking skills in physics learning : a preliminary study of games application integrated augmented reality. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2377, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2377/1/012088
Schunk, D. H. (2016). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Pearson.
Simamora, A. B., Manalu, A., & Simamora, R. (2024). The effectiveness of BRADeR learning model to improve junior high school students’ science literacy abilities. Research and Development in Education (RaDEn), 4(2), 1158–1168. https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i
Simamora, A. B., Sanjaya, I. G. M., & Widodo, W. (2022). Validity of BRADeR learning model development: An innovative learning model to improve science literacy skills for junior high school students. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(8), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n8p311
Slavin, R. E. (2012). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Stit, S. (2019). Teori konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Keislaman Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.36088/islamika.v1i2.208
Thapaliya, P., & Luitel, B. C. (2025). Exploring the dis/empowering cultures in prospective science learning: nurturing transformative learning. Cogent Education, 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2474278
Yusmar, F., & Fadilah, R.E. (2023). Analisis rendahnya literasi sains peserta didik indonesia: hasil PISA dan faktor penyebab. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 13(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v13i1.283
Zou’bi, R. A. (2021). The impact of media and information literacy on acquiring the critical thinking skill by the educational faculty’s students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100782
Copyright (c) 2025 IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


