Effectiveness of ADI-STEM to Improve Student’s Science Literacy Skill
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI)–Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) model in improving students' scientific literacy abilities. Method: The method used in this research is the literature review method. The literature review is a type of research used to collect data and information by collecting and reviewing various references. This study analyzes as many as 20 national and international articles that can be accounted for. The articles used were published in 2015-2022. The steps taken in this study were identifying topics, finding and selecting appropriate articles, analyzing and synthesizing the literature, and concluding. Result: Based on the results of the studies and analyses that have been carried out, it can be concluded that (1) the application of the ADI learning model can improve students' scientific literacy skills; (2) the ability to argumentation skills to increase students' scientific literacy; (3) integrating STEM into the learning process is also able to improve scientific literacy skills because STEM provides opportunities for students to identify real-life problems. Novelty: This study reveals that students' scientific literacy can be increased effectively by integrating ADI and STEM. These findings invite researchers, educators, and the government to develop learning that facilitates ADI-STEM learning.
Abstract View: 808 
PDF Download: 509
Similarity Check Download: 70
Metrics
References
Adom, D., Mensah, J. A., & Dake, D. A. (2020). Test, measurement, and evaluation: Understanding and use of the concepts in education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20457
Adriyawati, A., Utomo, E., Rahmawati, Y., & Mardiah, A. (2020). Steam-project-based learning integration to improve elementary school students’ scientific literacy on alternative energy learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 1863–1873. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080523
Aguilera, D., & Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). STEM vs. STEAM education and student creativity: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(7), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331
Amiela, S. D. (2018). Enhancing Students ’ argumentation skills using an argument driven inquiry-based module. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 12(3), 464–471. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i3.8042
Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2021). Metacognitive argument-driven inquiry in teaching antimicrobial resistance: Effects on students’ conceptual understanding and argumentation skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(2), 192–217. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.60
Arief, M. K., & Utari, S. (2015). Implementation of levels of inquiry on science learning to improve junior high school student’s scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 11(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v11i2.4233
Astuti, W., Sulastri, S., Syukri, M., & Halim, A. (2023). Implementasi pendekatan science, technology, engineering, and mathematics untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi sains dan kreativitas siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 11(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v11i1.26646
Asyhari, A., & Clara, G. P. (2017). Pengaruh pembelajaran levels of inquiry terhadap kemampuan literasi sains siswa. Scientiae Educatia, 6(2), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v6i2.2000
Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2016). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal Scince Teaching, 49(1), 68–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20446
Baran, E., Bilici, S. C., Mesutoglu, C., & Ocak, C. (2019). The impact of an out‐of‐school STEM education program on students’ attitudes toward STEM and STEM careers. School Science and Mathematics, 119(4), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12330
Børte, K., Nesje, K., & Lillejord, S. (2023). Barriers to student active learning in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(3), 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1839746
Cahyono, A. N., Asikin, M., Zahid, M. Z., Laksmiwati, P. A., & Miftahudin, M. (2021). The RoboSTE[M] project: Using robotics learning in a STEM education model to help prospective mathematics teachers promote students’ 21st-century skills. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(7), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.20.7.5
Cairns, D. (2019). Investigating the relationship between instructional practices and science achievement in an inquiry-based learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2113–2135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1660927
Castro, E. A. M. (2023). Analysis of problem solving ability of first middle school students in learning science. Integrated Science Education Journal, 4(2), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v4i2.329
Chen, Y. C., Benus, M. J., & Hernandez, J. (2019). Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation. Science Education, 103(5), 1235–1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21527
Chin, C. C., Yang, W. C., & Tuan, H. L. (2016). Argumentation in a socioscientific context and its influence on fundamental and derived science literacies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 603–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9606-1
Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research. planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc.
Delfita, R., Setiawati, F., Marneli, D., & Putra, A. I. (2021). Relationship between scientific argumentation skills and students’ scientific literacy skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0020-1
Erduran, S., & Yilmaz, Y. O. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in science education : A journal content analysis from 1998-2014. International Journal of STEM Education, 2, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0020-1
Fadhilah, R. A. N., & Hidayah, R. (2020). Profil kemampuan literasi sains peserta didik pada materi reaksi reduksi oksidasi dan implementasi LKPD berorientasi blended learning di SMA. Seminar Nasional Kimia, 135–143.
Fadila, D., Suliyanah, S., & Deta, U. A. (2020). Analysis of interest and scientific literacy skills of senior high school in learning physics. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 8(2), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v8i2.3195
Fadlika, R., Hernawati, D., & Meylani, V. (2022). Kemampuan argumentasi dan kemampuan literasi sains peserta didik kelas XI MIPA pada materi sel. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 12(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v12i1.156
Farida, I., &, & Gusniarti, W. F. (2015). Profil keterampilan argumentasi siswa pada konsep koloid yang dikembangkan melalui pembelajaran inkuiri argumentatif. Edusains, 6(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v6i1.1098
Gamage, K. A. A., Wijesuriya, D. I., Ekanayake, S. Y., Rennie, A. E. W., Lambert, C. G., & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online delivery of teaching and laboratory practices: Continuity of university programmes during COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 10(10), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100291
Hamzah, A. F., Suprapto, P. K., & Meylan, V. (2020). Kemampuan kognitif dan literasi sains: Sebuah model pembelajaran argument-driven inquiry pada materi jaringan tumbuhan. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 5(1), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.31932/jpbio.v5i1.590
Hasana, I., Saptasari, M., & Wulandari, N. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian kemampuan literasi sains siswa kelas XI materi sistem ekskresi dan koordinasi di SMAN 9 malang. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 8(2), 52–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um052v8i2p52-56
Herlanti, Y., Mardiati, Y., Rahmawati, R., Putri, A. M. K., Jamil, N., Miftahuzzakiyah, M., Sofyan, A., Zulfiani, Z., & Sugiarti, S. (2019). Finding learning strategy in improving science literacy. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 5(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v5i1.4902
Hidayati, S. N., Dasna, I. W., Munzil, M., Wonorahardjo, S., & Kohar, A. W. (2023). Prospective science teachers’ information literacy and scientific argumentation skills in online learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.41798
Hikmah, S. I., & Nasrudin, H. (2023). Validity of student worksheets based on model argument driven inquiry integrated by STEM to train students ’ argumentation ability and self-efficacy in chemical equilibrium material. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(4), 416–433. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i4.300
Ilma, A. Z., Wilujeng, I., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2022). Literature Review of Science Learning Activities with Integrated STEM Education. 2nd Basic and Applied Science COnference (BASC), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.11594/nstp.2022.2502
Ismail, I., Afriana, J., & Saputra, M. (2015). Models of integrated STEM (Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) learning to build scientific literacy. Proceeding of International Seminar on Science Education Yogyakarta State University, 222–229.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Crujeiras, B. (2017). Epistemic practices and scientific practices in science teaching. Science Education, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-749-8_5
Kefalis, C., & Drigas, A. (2019). Web based and online applications in STEM education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 9(4), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v9i4.10691
Kencana, M. A., Musri, M., & Syukri, M. (2020). The effect of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) on students’ creative thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012141
Khaeroningtyas, N., Permanasari, A., & Hamidah, I. (2016). STEM learning in material of temperature and its change to improve scietific literacy of junior hight school student. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5797
Kulisah, K., Juanda, A., & Ekanara, B. (2023). Hubungan kemampuan literais sains dengan keterampilan argumentasi siswa kelas X pada materi keanekaragaman hayati di SMAN 1 arjawinangun. Didaktika Biologi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi, 3, 1–5.
Lestari, H., Ali, M., Sopandi, W., Wulan, A. R., & Rahmawati, I. (2022). The impact of the RADEC learning model oriented ESD on students’ sustainability consciousness in elementary school. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 12(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.02.11
Lestari, H., Rahmawati, I., Siskandar, R., & Dafenta, H. (2021). Implementation of blended learning with a STEM approach to improve student scientific literacy skills during the COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 224-231. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7i2.654
Mawaddah, H., & Khairuna, K. (2022). The effect of argumentation skilld and problem base learning on science literacy of high school student. Jurnal Pendidikan Mipa, 12, 682–689. http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i3.pp1286-1295
Morze, N., Smyrnova-Trybulska, E., & Gladun, M. (2018). Selected aspects of IBL in STEM-education. Studio NOA for University of Silesia in Katowice.
Mufit, F., Asrizal, Hanum, S. A., & Fadhilah, A. (2020). Preliminary research in the development of physics teaching materials that integrate new literacy and disaster literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1481(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012041
Nofiana, M., & Julianto, T. (2018). Upaya peningkatan literasi sians siswa melalui pembelajaran berbasis keunggulan lokal. BIOSFER Jurnal Tadris Pendidikan Biologi, 9(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.24042/biosf.v9i1.2876
Novitasari, N., & Admoko, S. (2022). Pengembangan LKPD pembelajaran argument-driven inquiry untuk meningkatkan ketrampilan literasi sains pada. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Fisika, 13(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v13i1.11528
Novitasari, N., Asfiyah, M. H. Z., Lentika, D. L., Maghfiroh, D. R., & Admoko, S. (2022). Pengembangan LKPD model pembelajaran argument driven inquiry untuk meningkatkan keterampilan literasi sains siswa. ORBITA. Jurnal Hasil Kajian, Inovasi, dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika, 8, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v8i1.8412
Nurhusna, F., Rosidin, U., Herlina, K., & Hasnunidah, N. (2018). Pengaruh penerapan model adi terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis berdasarkan perbedaan tipe kepribadian. Journal of Komodo Science Education, 1(1), 39–52.
Nurrahman, A., Kadaritna, N., & Tania, L. (2018). Efektivitas model pembelajaran ADI dalam meningkatkan penguasaan konsep siswa berdasarkan kemampuan akademik. FKIP Universitas Lampung, 20(1), 1–14.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assesment and Analytical Framework, 97–117. OECD Publishing.
Petyko, Z. I., Zoltan, K., Jaime, E., Podrazilova, K., Tesar, T.,Nikos, M., Frank-Ulrich, F., & Andras, I. (2021). Development of score evaluation framework value-added medicines: Report 1 on methodology and findings. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 19, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-021-00311-6
Oktavia, R. (2015). Penerapan model pembelajaran berbasis proyek dengan pendekatan integrasi STEM dalam meningkatkan penguasaan konsep dan keterampilan berfikir kreatif siswa SMP pada materi gelombang bunyi. Thesis. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Pramesti, D., Probosari, R. M., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2022). Effectiveness of project based learning low carbon STEM and discovery learning to improve creative thinking skills. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(3), 444–456. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i3.156
Pujiati, A. (2019). Peningkatan literasi sains dengan pembelajaran STEM di era revolusi industri 4.0. Prosiding Diskusi Panel Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 547–554.
Putranta, H., & Supahar, S. (2019). Synthesis of the cognitive aspects’ science literacy and higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in chapter momentum and impulse. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1397(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012014
Ramdani, A., Jufri, A. W., Gunawan, G., Fahrurrozi, M., & Yustiqvar, M. (2021). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skills in terms of gender using science teaching materials based on the 5E learning cycle integrated with local wisdom. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i2.29956
Robinson, H., Al-Freih, M., & Kilgore, W. (2020). Designing with care: Towards a care-centered model for online learning design. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(3), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-10-2019-0098
Sabrina, F., Rachmadiarti, F., & Sunarti, T. (2021). Analisis literasi sains peserta didik SMA pada materi fluida dinamis. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 11(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v11n1.p40-51
Safira, C. A., Hasnunidah, N., & Sikumbang, D. (2018). Pengaruh model pembelajaran argument-driven inquiry (ADI) terhadap keterampilan argumentasi siswa berkemampuan akademik berbeda. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 1(2), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v1i2.13046
Sampson, V., Hutner, T. L., Fitzpatrick, D., Lamee, A., & Grooms, J. (2017). Argument-driven inquiry in physics mechanics lab investigations for grades. NSTA Press.
Sampson, V., Gleim, L., & Sampson, V. (2009). Argument-driven inquiry to promote the understanding of important concepts & practices in biology. The American Biology Teacher, 71(8), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.2307/20565359
Schleicher, A. (2018). PISA 2018. Insights and Interpretations. OECD Secretary-General.
Sengul, O. (2019). Linking scientific literacy, scientific argumentation, and democratic citizenship. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070421
Setiawan, A. R., & Saputri, W. E. (2020). Pembelajaran Literasi saintifik untuk pendidikan dasar. Media Penelitian Pendidikan : Jurnal Penelitian Dalam Bidang Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 14(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.26877/mpp.v14i2.5794
Sole, F. B. (2021). Implementation of STEM-based learning for strengthening science literacy of students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7, 382-388. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.1266
Sunarsih, S., Rahayuningsih, M., & Setiati, N. (2020). The development of biodiversity module using discovery learning based on local potential of wonosobo. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v8i1.31178
Sulistiyowati, S., Abdurrahman, A., & Jalmo, T. (2018). The effect of STEM-based worksheet on students’ science literacy. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i1.2141
Supriyadi, A., Desy, D., Suharyat, Y., Santosa, T. A., & Sofianora, A. (2023). The effectiveness of STEM-integrated blended learning on indonesia student scientific literacy: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education and Literature, 2(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.55606/ijel.v2i1.53
Struyf, A., De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: Integrated STEM education as promising practice? International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1387–1407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983
Syahmani, S., Hafizah, E., Brigjend, J., & Basry, H. H. (2021). Pengaruh pembelajaran dengan pendekatan STEM berbasis lahan basah pada literasi sains siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lingkungan Lahan Basah, 6, 1-10.
Tomovic, C., Mckinney, S., & Berube, C. (2017). Scientific literacy matters: Using literature to meet next generation science standards and 21 st century skills. K-12 STEM Education, 3(2), 179–191.
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument: Updated edition. In The Uses of Argument: Updated Edition. Cambridge University Press.
Utami, P. Q., & Dasna, I. W. (2022). Penerapan model pembelajaran argument driven inquiry terhadap kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian dan Pengembangan, 7(4), 122–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v7i4.15217
Utami, S. S., Sari, R., Aisyah, S., & Affifah, I. (2022). Application of the argument-driven inquiry learning model in stimulating students ’ scientific argumentation skills on acid-base material. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 6(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v6i1.39162
Wang, J., & Buck, G. A. (2016). Understanding a high school physics teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge of argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(5), 577–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9476-1
Widya, W., Rifandi, R., & Laila Rahmi, Y. (2019). STEM education to fulfil the 21st century demand: A literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012208
World Economic Forum. (2015). New vision for education unlocking the potential of technology. World Economic Forum.
Yuliati, Y., & Saputra, D. S. (2019). Urgensi pendidikan STEM terhadap literasi sains mahasiswa calon guru. Proceedings of The ICECRS: Literacy based Character and Professionalism Enhancement for Educators in Facing Industrial Revolution 4.0, 2(1), 321-326. https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v2i1.2420
Copyright (c) 2023 IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 808 times
PDF downloaded = 509 times
Similarity Check downloaded = 70 times
