Effectiveness of the Creative Attitude Model in Science Learning (CASL) to Train Creative Thinking Skills for Elementary School Teacher  Education Students

Julianto Julianto; Wasis Wasis; Rudiana Agustini

doi:10.46245/ijorer.v3i5.237

Julianto Julianto State University of Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Wasis Wasis State University of Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Rudiana Agustini State University of Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i5.237

Keywords: CASL, Creative thinking skills, Education, Science learning, Teacher education

Abstract

Students must have superior competencies to answer the demands of 21st century skills and the Industrial Revolution 4.0, one of which is creative thinking skills. The purpose of this study was to produce a Creative Attitude in Science Learning (CASL) learning model as a valid, practical, and effective product/product as an effort to improve creative thinking skills and positive attitudes towards PGSD Science students. The development research design used refers to the development model design according to McKenny, consisting of: (1) preliminary study phase, including needs analysis, literature study, and field survey; (2) the model design phase includes model design, validation, revision; and (3) the model testing phase. The research subjects were 3 classes of the Elementary School Teacher Education study program. The data collection method used a creative thinking skills test sheet. The data analysis technique used is descriptive qualitative and quantitative. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the CASL model can be used to train the creative. thinking skills of elementary school teacher education students.

Abstract View: 174

PDF Download: 161

Similarity Check Download: 17

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Anggoro, S., Sopandi, W., & Sholehuddin, M. (2017). Influence of joyful learning on elementary school students’attitudes toward science. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1-7.

Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach. New York: Mc. Graw-Hill.

Ayas, M. B., & Sak, U. (2014). Objective measure of scientificcreativity: Psychometric validity of the creative scientific ability test. Sciencedirect Procedia Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.001

Bappenas. (2014). Rancangan awal rencana pembangunan jangka menengah nasional 2015-2019: Buku II agenda pembangunan bidang. Jakarta: Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/ Badan Peremcanaan Pembangunan Nasional.

Beckers, J., Dolmans, D., & Marrien, J. V. (2017). E-portofolios enhancing student’s self-directed learning: a systematic review of influencing factors. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 32-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2528

Cohen, L. N. M., & Ambrose, D. (1999). Adaptation and creativity. Encyclopedia of Creativity, 1(A), 9-22.

Daud, A. M., Omar, J., Turiman, P., & Osman, K. (2012). Creativity in science education. Sciencedirect Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 59, 467-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.302

Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (2013). Educational psychology: Windows on classroom (9th edition). New Jersey: Pearson.

Fisher, R. (2005). Teaching children to learn. Cheltenham: Stanley Hornes.

Guilford, J. P., & Vaughan, A. T. (1965). “Factors that Aid and Hinder Creativity”. Teachers College Record, 63(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146816206300503

Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2010). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students’. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912

Hu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C., & Meyer, W. (2013). Increasing student’s scientific creativity: The learn to think intervention program. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 3-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jocb.20

Irving, W., Paul, P., & Sayre, C .E. (2015). Becoming a physicist: The role of research, mindsets, and milestones in upper-division student perceptions. Physical Review Special Topic Physics Education Research, 11(2), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020120

Kemenristekdikti No. 44. (2015). Standar nasional perguruan tinggi. Jakarta: kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia.

Moreno, R. (2010). Educational psichology. New Mexcico: John Wiley & Sons.

Faridah, M., Mufti, N., Rozmel, A. L., & Amin, M. M. (2012). Project-based learning (PjBL): Inculcating soft skill in 21st century workplace. Sciencedirect Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 59, 565-573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.315

Nur, M. (2014). Berpikir kreatif. Surabaya: Penelitian Unggulan perguruan tinggi, Unesa.

Ozgelen, S. (2012). Students’ science process skills within a cognitive domain framework. Eurasia Journal Mathemathics, Science & Technology Education, 8(4), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.846a

Pekmez, E. S., Aktamis, H., & Taskin, B. C. (2009). Exploring scientific creativity of 7th grade student’s. Journal of Qafqaz university, 204-214.

Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan nomor 20-24 tentang perubahan kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi. (2015). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan nomor 44 tentang standar nasional pendidikan tinggi. Jakarta: Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi.

Peraturan Presiden. (2012). peraturan presiden nomor 8 tahun 2012 tentang kerangka kualifikasi nasional indonesia. Jakarta: Peraturan Presiden.

Rannikmae, M. (2016). Some crucial areas in science education research corresponding to the needs of the contempory society. Journal of Balti Science Education, 15(1), 4-6.

Santrock, S. (2009). Educational psichology. New Mexcico. John wiley & Sons.

Torrance, E. P. (2013). Science view of creativity and factors affecting its growth. Daedalus, 94(3), 663-681.