Implementation of Continuous-Assessment on Postgraduate Program
Abstract
Objective: The assessment approach is crucial to achieving learning outcomes. Contonuous-Assessment (CA) is one alternative assessment that can be used to increase various skills. This preliminary study aims to: (1) formulate CA and project-based assessment in higher education; (2) describe the lecturer's and students' perception of CA in the postgraduate program; (3) map course assignments within the framework of CA at the postgraduate level. Method: Data was collected through Forum Group Discussions (FGDs) and questionnaires. Data were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Results: The results show that the conceptual study of the CA should pay attention to the purposes, improve the learning process, involve students fully and purposefully in their learning, and explore the factors that influence the learning process. The design of CA is realized as demand mapping for each course in the form of products or small projects as part of the stages for completing a thesis/dissertation. Most lecturers and students agree that the lecture process uses a CA design in which each course contributes to achieving the thesis/dissertation. A small number of them disagree and give some suggestions. Novelty: The novelty of this research is to produce a mapping of assignments from all courses, which leads to the completion of writing a thesis/dissertation.



Metrics
References
Adesoji, F. A., & Kenni, A. M. (2013). Continuous assessment, mock results, and gender as predictors of academic performance of chemistry students in WASSCE and NECO examinations in Ekiti state. International Education Studies, 6(7), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n7p1
Bakhru, S. A., & Mehta, R. P. (2020). Assignment and project activity-based learning systems as an alternative to continuous internal assessment. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.073
Billings, S., & England, M. (2020). First-year computer science projects at coventry university. Cornell University.
Borich, G. D., Godbout, R. C., Peck, R. F., Kash, M. M., & Poynor, L. H. (1994). An evaluation of the personalized model of the teacher. Research and Development Center for Teacher Education The University of Texas at Austin.
Box, C. (2018). Formative assessment in united states classrooms: Changing the landscape of teaching and learning. Springer.
Carrillo, D. L., García, A. C., Laguna, T. R., Magán, G. R., & Moreno, J. A. L. (2019). Using gamification in a teaching innovation project at the university of alcalá: A new approach to experimental science practices. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 17(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.34190/JEL.17.2.03
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (fourth edition). SAGE Publication, Inc.
Day, I. N. Z., van Blankenstein, F. M., Westenberg, P. M., & Admiraal, W. F. (2018). Explaining individual student success using continuous assessment types and student characteristics. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(5), 937–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1466868
De Santos-Berbel, C., Hernando García, J. I., & De Santos Berbel, L. (2022). Undergraduate student performance in a structural analysis course: Continuous assessment before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. Education Sciences, 12(8), 561-575. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080561
Dejene, W., & Chen, D. (2019). The practice of modularized curriculum in higher education institution: Active learning and continuous assessment in focus. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1611052
Durovic, G., Dlab, M. H., & Hoic-Bozic, N. (2020). Continuous summative assessment sessions in vocational STEM education. Proceedings - 2020 14th Technologies Applied to Electronics Teaching Conference, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAEE46915.2020.9163777
Faremi, Y. A., & Faremi, M. F. (2020). Continuous assessment of undergraduates as a predictor of their academic performance in educational administration and planning courses. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5212–5221. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081122
Gillis, A., & Krull, L. M. (2020). COVID-19 remote learning transition in spring 2020: Class structures, student perceptions, and inequality in college courses. Teaching Sociology, 48(4), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X20954263
González-Campos, G., Castañeda-Vázquez, C., & Campos-Mesa, M. D. C. (2018). Continuous assessment and interactive response systems in higher education. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 13(3), 667–681. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2018.133.17
Holmes, N. (2015). Student perceptions of their learning and engagement in response to the use of a continuous e-assessment in an undergraduate module. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.881978
Kazerouni, A. M. (2019). Toward continuous assessment of the programming process. ICER 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, 335–336. https://doi.org/10.1145/3291279.3339429
Llamas-Nistal, M., Mikic-Fonte, F. A., Caeiro-Rodriguez, M., & Liz-Dominguez, M. (2019). Supporting intensive continuous assessment with BeA in a flipped classroom experience. IEEE Access, 7, 150022–150036. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946908
Martínez, E. O., Jaén, J. M. S., & Hernández, S. M. (2020). Continuous assessment at university teaching accounting. Revista de Investigacion Educativa, 38(1), 109–129.
McCarthy, K. S., & McNamara, D. S. (2021). The multidimensional knowledge in text comprehension framework. Educational Psychologist, 56(3), 196–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1872379
Mohanty, A., Alam, A., Sarkar, R., & Chaudhury, S. (2021). Design and development of digital game-based learning software for incorporation into school syllabus and curriculum transaction. Design Engineering, 4864–4900.
Morales, M., Salmerón, A., Maldonado, A. D., Masegosa, A. R., & Rumí, R. (2022). An empirical analysis of the impact of continuous assessment on the final exam mark. Mathematics, 10(21), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10213994
Nziku, D., & Matogwa, C. B. (2021). Investigation of the roles of continuous assessment towards students’ performance in secondary school national examinations. African Journal of Applied Research, 7(2), 123–136.
Ozaktas, H. M. (2013). Teaching science, technology, and society to engineer students: A sixteen-year journey. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(4), 1439–1450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9329-4
Perales-Gómez, Á. L., López-de-Teruel, P. E., Ruiz, A., García-Mateos, G., Bernabé García, G., & García Clemente, F. J. (2022). FARMIT: Continuous assessment of crop quality using machine learning and deep learning techniques for IoT-based smart farming. Cluster Computing, 25(3), 2163–2178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-021-03489-9
Pressman, A. (2019). Design thinking: A guide to creative problem solving for everyone. Routledge.
Rahman, S., & Majumder, M. A. A. (2015). Is it an assessment of learning or an assessment for learning? South East Asia Journal of Public Health, 4(1), 72–74. https://doi.org/10.3329/seajph.v4i1.21847
Ramalepe, M. L., & Zengele, V. T. (2014). The role of school managers in the implementation of continuous assessment (CASS) in Mopani District. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(27), 544–555. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n27p544
Ristekdikti, M. (2015). Kerangka kualifikasi nasional indonesia. Direktorat Jendral Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan Kemenristekdikti.
Salekin, M. S., Zamzmi, G., Goldgof, D., Kasturi, R., Ho, T., & Sun, Y. (2020). The first investigation into the use of deep learning for continuous assessment of neonatal postoperative pain. Proceedings - 2020 15th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 415–419. https://doi.org/10.1109/FG47880.2020.00082
Sánchez-Ruiz, L. M., Moll-López, S., Moraño-Fernández, J. A., & Roselló, M. D. (2021). Dynamical continuous, discrete assessment of competencies achievement: An approach to continuous assessment. Mathematics, 9(17), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9172082
Sridharan, B. (2016). Authentic assessment methods: A practical handbook for teaching staff part-I. Deakin University.
Susantini, E., Ibrahim, M., Raharjo, R., Indana, S., Prastiwie, M. S., Putri E. K., Yakub, P. (2020). Assessment of learning assessment of learning. New South Wales.
Timmerman, K., & Doom, T. (2017). Infrastructure for continuous assessment of retained relevant knowledge. ACM Inroads, 8(2), 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3095781.3017738
Vahid, A., Walters, M. M., & Ross, A. H. A. (2021). Is continuous assessment fit for purpose? Analyzing the experiences of academics from a south african university of technology. Education Inquiry, 14(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1994687
Varghese, S. S., Ramesh, A., & Veeraiyan, D. N. (2019). Blended module-based teaching in biostatistics and research methodology: A retrospective study with postgraduate dental students. Journal of Dental Education, 83(4), 445–450. https://doi.org/10.21815/jde.019.054
Yakman, G., & Lee, H. (2012). STEAM education view project global language view project. Journal Korea Association Science Education, 32(6), 1072-1086. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.6.1072
Zhou, S., & Landa, N. (2018). Implicit formative assessment in LGCSE home economics: A case study of Lesotho and south africa. Journal of Educational Assessment in Africa, 13, 277-286.
Copyright (c) 2023 IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


